Laserfiche WebLink
Knight M sold <br /> CONSULTING Table2.8 <br /> Cripple Creek and Victor Gold Mining Co.(Newmont) <br /> Cripple Creek and Victor Mine <br /> Stormwater Management Plan Evaluation <br /> Previous:Current Comparisons—Existing Contributing Basin Areas and Runoff Curve Numbers <br /> Basin Steffens(2012) Knight Pl6sold(2018) Steffens(2012) Knight Pidsoid(2018) <br /> (Reference Figure 2.1) Total Area Total Area Composite Curve Number Composite Curve Number Potential Justification for Area Discrepancy <br /> ac ac CN CN <br /> EMP 6 Not Available NA 32.2 NA 74 Steffens NA. <br /> EMP 8a Area reduction:Previous inflow diversion channel removed. <br /> EMP 8b NA 137.3 NA 73 Steffens NA. <br /> EMP 8c NA 130.1 NA 91 Steffens NA. <br /> EMP 9a-d combined Area increase:New inflow diversion channel constructed. <br /> EMP 11 NA 58.2 NA 84 Steffens NA. <br /> EMP 13 57.3 Area increase:Steffens did not include area u radient of road within catchment,KP did. <br /> EMP 16 47.6 Area reduction:Steffens included waste rock area,KP did not. <br /> EMP 17,17a,17b combined 113.9 1 .5 Area reduction:Steffens included waste rock area,KP did not. <br /> EMP 18 64.9 49.0 69 71 Area reduction:Justification NA. <br /> IWEMP 20 110.6 18.5J111111111111 Area reduction:Steffens included waste rock area,KP did not. <br /> EMP 21 69 69 Area reduction:Justification NA. <br /> EMP 22 19.7 21.1 66 64 Similar areas and CNs. <br /> ECOSA toe berm NA 50 Steffens accounted for most of this area in EMPs 16 17 and 20. <br />