My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-03-01_HYDROLOGY - C1981010 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2018-03-01_HYDROLOGY - C1981010 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2018 9:17:50 AM
Creation date
4/26/2018 8:45:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
3/1/2018
Doc Name
CDPS/NPDES Permit
From
Department of Public Health & Environment
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
NPDES
Email Name
RAR
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COLORADO <br />Water Quality Assessment <br />Department of Public <br />:,b • Health b Environment <br />there is only an acute standard, the acute standard should be used. The appropriate standards are used in <br />the following antidegradation analysis. <br />Significance Tests for Temporary Impacts and Dilution <br />The ratio of the chronic (30E3) low flow to the design flow is 6:1, and is less than the 100:1 significance <br />criteria. Therefore, this facility is not exempt from an AD evaluation based on the dilution significance <br />determination test, and the AD evaluation must continue. <br />For the determination of a new or increased impact and for the remaining significance determination tests, <br />additional calculations are necessary. Therefore, at this point in the antidegradation evaluation, the Division <br />will go back to the new or increased impacts test. If there is a new or increased impact, the last two <br />significance tests will be evaluated. <br />New or Increased Impact and Non Impact Limitations (NILS) <br />To determine if there is a new or increased impact to the receiving water, a comparison of the new WQBEL <br />concentrations and loadings verses the concentrations and loadings as of September 30, 2000, needs to occur. <br />If either the new concentration or loading is greater than the September 2000 concentration or loading, then <br />a new or increased impact is determined. <br />Note that the AD Guidance document includes a step in the New or Increased Impact Test that calculates the <br />Non -Impact Limit (NIL). The permittee may choose to retain a NIL if certain conditions are met, and <br />therefore the AD evaluation for that parameter would be complete. As the NIL is typically greater than the <br />ADBAC, and is therefore the chosen limit, the Division will typically conclude the AD evaluation after <br />determining the NIL. Where the NILs are very stringent, or upon request of a permittee, the Division will <br />calculate both the NIL and the AD limitation so that the limitations can be compared and the permittee can <br />determine which of the two limits they would prefer, one which does not allow any increased impact (NIL), <br />or the other which allows an insignificant impact (AD limit). <br />The non -impact limit (NIL) is defined as the limit which results in no increased water quality impact (no <br />increase in load or limit over the September 2000 load or limit). The NIL is calculated as the September 2000 <br />loading, divided by the new design flow, and divided by a conversion factor of 8.34. If there is no change in <br />design flow, then the NIL is equal to the September 2000 permit limitation. <br />If the facility was in place, but did not have a limitation for a particular parameter in the September 2000 <br />permit, the Division may substitute an implicit limitation. Consistent with the First Update to the AD <br />Guidance of April 2002, an implicit limit is determined based on the approach that specifies that the implicit <br />limit is the maximum concentration of the effluent from October 1998 to September 2000, if such data is <br />available. If this data is unavailable, the Division may substitute more recent representative data, if <br />appropriate, on a case by case basis. Note that if there is a change in design flow, the implicit limit/loading <br />is subject to recalculation based on the new design flow. For parameters that are undisclosed by the <br />permittee, and unknown to the Division to be present, an implicit limitation may not be recognized. <br />This facility was in place as a discharger prior to September 30, 2000 and therefore the new or increased <br />impacts test must be conducted. For the existing outfalls (002, 011, 017, 020, 021, and 023) the design flow <br />of the outfalls have decreased collectively from the AD period as shown below (i.e. 21.73 MGD in the AD <br />period versus 11 MGD in this permit renewal). <br />The design flow at each outfall as of September 30, 2000 were as follows: <br />Outfall 002 = 7.06 MGD <br />Outfall 011 = 4.08 MGD <br />Outfall 017 = 1.37 MGD <br />Outfall 020 = 6.23 MGD <br />Outfall 021 = 2.08 MGD <br />Page 29 of 40 <br />4300 Cherry Creek Drive S., Denver, CO 80246-1530 303-692-2000 www.colorado.gov/cdphe/wqcd I �� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.