My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-04-02_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (7)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2018-04-02_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (7)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2018 8:05:29 AM
Creation date
4/25/2018 7:28:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/2/2018
Doc Name
Permits
Section_Exhibit Name
Volume 15 Rule 2
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RULE 2 PERMITS <br />the prominent ridge and high elevations in the extreme southern end of the Soils Survey Area. <br />Transitional moisture zones include aridic ridge tops and south -facing slopes, and ustic valley bottoms <br />and steep north -facing slopes. Entisols were present throughout the Soils Survey Area on steep slopes, in <br />areas of active alluvial deposition, and areas of bedrock exposure or extremely shallow depth -to -bedrock. <br />The Collom permit expansion area contains deep soils in mostly gently to moderately sloping locations on <br />the benches and drainages, shallow soils on steep slopes at the north end of the area and very deep soils <br />on steep slopes at the southern end of the area. Except for the north end of the area, the primary limitation <br />of the soils in the Collom permit expansion area is the high percentage of clay. The other primary concern <br />is a high percentage of coarse fragments and occasionally shallow depths to bedrock restricting salvage <br />depths. Soils on the northern end of the area are very deep loess derived soils with stripping depths of two <br />feet or more over large areas of north facing slopes. <br />The potential for wind erosion is based on the soil surface layer's texture, organic matter content, <br />carbonate reaction, mineralogy, and coarse fragment content are factors affecting soil loss due to wind <br />erosion (USDA 2003). Clay content, organic matter, and coarse fragment content decrease wind erodibility, <br />whereas silty and fine sandy surface materials are the most prone to wind erosion. While many of the soils in <br />the Soils Survey Area are in a fine textural family, many have much more loamy surface textures. This is <br />primarily a result of the notable loess influence on soils throughout the Soils Survey Area. Those soils with <br />the most notable loess influence, including Shawa, Maudlin, Weed, Skyway, and Lamphier, are all highly <br />erodible by wind. In the absence of moisture, these soils may begin to erode and may be difficult to <br />stabilize once exposed. The deep blowouts created in areas of intense traffic on ridges in the southwestern <br />portion of the Soils Survey Area are evidence of this erodibility. Care should be taken when salvaging and <br />replacing these soils to limit their exposure to wind. <br />The fine sand and silt fractions of soil are most susceptible to water erosion while organic matter and <br />coarse fragments reduce susceptibility to erosion. Water erosion hazard is based on a soil-erodibility factor <br />(K -factor) which is determined by the percentage of silt, clay, very fine sand, and organic matter of the <br />surface horizon, soil structure, and profile permeability class. K -factors commonly range from less than <br />0.05 to over 0.5. If the K -factor is below 0.3, susceptibility to water erosion is low and the soil is "good" <br />for use in reclamation without limits. However, when the K -factor approaches or exceeds 0.4, there is <br />notable potential for water erosion from overland flow when it occurs. <br />While the surface soil is the material initially at risk from runoff and water erosion when a soil is exposed, <br />soils within the top 12 inches of each site were evaluated to consider the effects of mixing during salvage <br />operations. Textural and organic matter values used in the calculation of the K -factor for the soils of the <br />Soils Survey Area were determined through review of laboratory results. Soil structure and permeability <br />class were based on field observations. The K -factors were calculated using the soil erodibility equation <br />presented in the NSSH (MRCS, 2003a). The results of these calculations (Kf) are shown with other soil <br />physical properties in Table 2.04.9.18. <br />None of the soils tested in the Soils Survey Area had K -factors in excess of 0.4, but several did have <br />values greater than 0.25, indicating a moderate susceptibility to water erosion. Sites with K -factors in <br />excess of 0.25 were residual and colluvial soils located on ridge crests and steep slopes in the extreme <br />southern end of the Soils Survey Area, or soils developed on alluvial fans, terraces, and other gentle <br />sloping sites in the northern portion of the Soils Survey Area. These locations correlate closely to <br />alluvium and other soils formed in materials weathered from hard sandstones and siltstones in the lower <br />portion of the Williams Fork Formation and the upper portion of the Iles Formation. In light of these <br />moderately high K -factors, it is advisable to avoid placement of these materials on steep slopes in the <br />post -mine landscape, or ensure that they are mixed with other less erosive soils. <br />Collom — Rule 2, Page 38 Revision Date: 12/30/16 <br />Revision No.: TR -108 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.