My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-04-02_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (7)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2018-04-02_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (7)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2018 8:05:29 AM
Creation date
4/25/2018 7:28:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/2/2018
Doc Name
Permits
Section_Exhibit Name
Volume 15 Rule 2
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RULE 2 PERMITS <br />anomalous in nature. Horizons greater than 18 inches thick were collected from the lower portion of the <br />soil horizon. One to eight samples were collected from each sampled pedon, with more than four samples <br />collected from each site on average. A total of 426 samples were collected for laboratory analysis. Sample <br />locations are shown on Map 5D. <br />Soil physicochemical data from the 95 soil profiles are provided in Table 2.04.9-17 and Table 2.04.9-18. <br />Descriptions of the soil map units identified in the Collom permit expansion area are presented in the <br />Baseline Soil Survey (Exhibit 9, Item 8). The parameters analyzed include the following: <br />1. Texture (including the sample's coarse fragment content and percentage of sand, very fine sand, silt <br />and clay) <br />2. pH (acidity/alkalinity) <br />3. Electrical Conductivity <br />4. Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR) <br />5. Saturation Percentage <br />Additional parameters were analyzed in accordance with the following protocol and as presented on the <br />Laboratory Reports contained in the baseline soil survey (Exhibit 9, Item 8). All parameters were analyzed <br />using the methods specified by the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality (WDEQ) Topsoil and <br />Overburden Guidelines (Guideline 1; WDEQ 2004). The parameters analyzed include the following: <br />1. Texture (including the sample's coarse fragment content and percentage of sand, very fine sand, silt <br />and clay) <br />2. pH (acidity/alkalinity) <br />3. Electrical Conductivity <br />4. Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR) <br />5. Saturation Percentage <br />Additional parameters were analyzed in accordance with the following protocol and as presented on the <br />Laboratory Reports contained in the baseline soil survey (Exhibit 9, Item 8). <br />Fertility(Organic Matter Content, Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Potassium): <br />The following horizons from all sample sites were analyzed for soil fertility: <br />1. All A horizons; <br />2. All B and C horizons beginning within 24 inches of the ground surface; and, <br />3. Those B and C horizons with less than 35 percent clay and less than 35 percent coarse fragments. <br />Boron and Selenium: <br />Boron and selenium were not known to be present in elevated concentrations in the Soils Survey Area. <br />However, to provide information for screening, the thickest horizon beginning within the top 24 inches of the <br />soil profile was analyzed for these parameters. <br />The soil laboratory and field data were compared with the preliminary topsoil and substitute topsoil <br />suitability criteria shown on Table 2.04.9-19 to determine the suitability of each horizon and map unit. <br />These suitability criteria were developed based on a review of Wyoming Department of Environmental <br />Quality (2004) and Montana Department of Environmental Quality (1998) topsoil and overburden <br />suitability guidelines in conjunction with operational and sound reclamation practices for mined land <br />reclamation. Based on these comparisons, soil horizons that exceeded the criteria provided on the table <br />were identified and were considered unsuitable as a plant growth medium for reclamation. The salvage <br />depth for each series was from the surface to the top of the first unsuitable horizon. <br />Collom — Rule 2, Page 36 Revision Date: 12/30/16 <br />Revision No.: TR -108 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.