My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-04-02_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (7)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2018-04-02_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (7)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2018 8:05:29 AM
Creation date
4/25/2018 7:28:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/2/2018
Doc Name
Permits
Section_Exhibit Name
Volume 15 Rule 2
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RULE 2 PERMITS <br />reviewed and approved by the CMLRD prior to completion of the baseline monitoring program. Water <br />quality sampling and laboratory analyses were conducted in accordance with Rule 2.03.3(4). The depth to <br />water in each of the wells and field measurements for pH, electrical conductivity, and temperature were <br />monitored monthly. Quarterly monitoring included a full suite of analyses on each well. Water samples <br />from the wells were filtered in the field and preserved for analysis of dissolved metal concentrations. <br />Groundwater samples were also collected in Collom permit expansion area wells in 1984-1985, 1996- <br />1997, and 1999-2000 as part of earlier studies; pertinent data from those data sets are included in the <br />discussion presented in this section. Figures 2.04.7-36 and 2.04.7-37 present trilinear diagrams illustrating <br />water quality for representative bedrock and valley fill monitoring wells from the data collected during <br />baseline monitoring in 2004-2006. <br />Groundwater samples for water quality analysis were collected from the bedrock and monitoring wells in <br />2004 to 2006. Water samples were also collected from well C -04-16B (this well was one of several <br />monitoring wells around exploration hole C-04-16), constructed for use in a long-term aquifer test in the <br />proposed Collom Pit area, to characterize the groundwater that would be produced during Collom Pit <br />dewatering operations. Additional data collected in 1996 and 1997 from wells UL -95-01, W-95-11 and <br />UL -95-40 were also available. The locations of these wells are shown on Map 10B. A summary of the <br />sampling history and results is provided in Table 2.04.7-42 for the bedrock wells. Table 2.04.7-42 also <br />lists the Federal drinking water maximum contaminant levels (MCLS) and secondary drinking water <br />quality criteria. Although these criteria are not specifically applicable, they provide a basis for <br />comparison. <br />The inorganic chemistry of the bedrock groundwater changes as a function of depth and distance downdip <br />along groundwater flow paths. Groundwater samples from the F sandstone are calcium/magnesium— <br />bicarbonate waters and fall within Region 1 on Figure 2.04.7-39. Within Region 1, the downdip wells <br />show a gradual evolution toward sodium -bicarbonate water. Samples from the F/G sequence contain <br />higher percentages of bicarbonate and occupy Region 2. These wells also evolve towards a more sodic <br />chemistry with distance down dip. Samples collected from well C-04-1613, which is screened over the <br />400 -ft interval from the D coal to the H sandstone, fall into to this region and most closely resemble the <br />groundwater from well MWC-04-13FG. Groundwaters in the H sandstone are all sodium bicarbonate <br />types, with the sodium content a function of the distance down dip. These groundwaters generally plot in <br />Region 3 on Figure 2.04.7-39. The inorganic chemistry of some of the samples collected from wells <br />MWC-04-33H and MWC-04-13H plots in Region 1. Well MWC-04-033H is actually screened in the <br />lower part of the G sequence and plots near Region 2, as would be more typical for its construction. Two <br />samples from well MWC-04-13H plot in Region 1, close to the samples from well MWC-04-13FS, <br />suggesting either a hydraulic connection or possibly a handling issue with those samples from well <br />MWC-04-13H. The other samples from well MWC-04-13H plot at the extreme far end of Region 3, as <br />expected. <br />Historic data from well UL -95-01, located a short distance northeast of well cluster MWC-04-33 and <br />completed in the Fab coal seam, indicate groundwater quality that plots in Region 2 on Figure 2.04.7-39. <br />The chemistry of this groundwater is very similar to a majority of samples from upgradient F sandstone <br />wells. Samples from well UL -95-01 collected between September 1996 and August 1997 show relatively <br />little variation over time. Samples from well W-95-11, located on the ridge crest between Jubb and <br />Wilson Creeks, plot in Region 2, indicating that the well is screened in the F/G sequence. The samples <br />show little variation between October 1996 and August 1997. Total dissolved solids (TDS) ranged <br />between 500 and 1,000 milligrams per liter (mg/L), which exceeds the secondary drinking water MCL of <br />500 mg/L. The pH of the samples is slightly alkaline, ranging from 7.6 to 8.1. Concentrations of dissolved <br />metals were generally low. Problematic metals (cadmium, lead, mercury and selenium) were not detected <br />above the laboratory reporting limits. Concentrations of iron and manganese exceeded their respective <br />Collom — Rule 2, Page 26 Revision Date: 12/30/16 <br />Revision No.: TR -108 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.