My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-03-20_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2018-03-20_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/12/2018 7:38:33 AM
Creation date
4/25/2018 6:42:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/20/2018
Doc Name
Volume 1 Rule 4
Section_Exhibit Name
4.02 Throuugh 4.30
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RULE 4 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS <br />were set higher than the premining condition, the ability to achieve bond release levels for shrubs <br />would be most adversely affected. Higher levels of herbaceous cover would adversely compete <br />against woody vegetation and hinder its successful establishment. <br />2. In mined -land reclamation it is important to have adequate herbaceous cover to provide for <br />erosion control. The reference areas at Colowyo indicate herbaceous cover values of 41.8% and <br />30.17% for the mountain shrub and sage reference areas, respectively. <br />Colowyo is located at approximately- 7,300 feet in elevation. The period of highest potential <br />erosion occurs in the springtime during snowmelt. At this time of year, erosion control is <br />provided almost exclusively by herbaceous vegetation. Erosion control by shrub cover is virtually <br />insignificant since the potential erosion occurs from snowmelt rather than raindrop impact. <br />Therefore, if pre -mining levels of herbaceous vegetative cover can be re-established, logically a <br />comparable level of erosion control will be achieved. <br />The ability to achieve adequate levels of herbaceous cover at Colowyo is, without question, quite <br />possible. The vegetative monitoring completed at Colowyo during the last three decades, and <br />summarized in Annual Reports, indicates that the premining levels of herbaceous cover are easily <br />achieved. <br />In fact, the vegetative data as summarized in the Various Annual Reports indicate that the levels <br />of herbaceous cover on the reclaimed areas may have exceeded the premine condition by 30% to <br />50%. <br />The vegetative sampling serves to confirm what can be observed in the field. The revegetation at <br />Colowyo is excellent and there is virtually no evidence of erosion attributable to a lack of cover. <br />In fact the herbaceous cover existing at Colowyo meets or exceeds the premining condition and is <br />undoubtedly providing significant competition with the woody specie seedlings. There is <br />certainly no evidence that herbaceous cover values on the reclaimed areas should be set higher <br />than the herbaceous cover of the premine areas in order to achieve bond release. <br />Herbaceous Production <br />For both Pre -2008 and Post -2008 revegetation (targeting (and achieving) the rangeland land use <br />subcomponent of grazingland), herbaceous production of the revegetated area will be considered adequate <br />for final bond release if it is not less than 90% of the herbaceous production, as determined from the <br />reference areas with a 90% statistical confidence utilizing a standard students statistical t-test comparison <br />of the means. As allowed under the rules promulgated on 9/14/05, these comparisons may utilize one of <br />three methods detailed under Rule 4.15.11 (2) [(a), (b) or (c)]. As allowed by Rule 4.15.7 (4), either <br />weighted -average or individual protocols will be followed. For grassland testing the weighted average <br />approach (Rule 4.15.7 (4) (b)) will be utilized where reference area data and revegetated area data are <br />"weighted" (each combined into single values for comparison) based on the proportional acreage of pre - <br />mine communities within the disturbance area footprint. Testing will then follow procedures detailed <br />under Rule 4.15.11 (2) with preference being given first to subsection (a) [direct comparison], second to <br />subsection (c) [reverse -null testing], and third subsection (b) [classic t-test]. <br />For areas designated as Post -2008 sagebrush steppe revegetation (rangeland land use subcomponent of <br />wildlife habitat), herbaceous production success criteria will be eliminated as a requirement should <br />CDRMS rules change as expected in the near future. In the meantime, for Post -2008 sagebrush steppe <br />revegetation, herbaceous production of the revegetated area will be considered adequate for final bond <br />release if it is not less than 70% of the herbaceous production as determined from the reference areas with <br />Rule 4 Performance Standards 4-58 Revision Date: 1/31/18 <br />Revision No.: TR -119 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.