Laserfiche WebLink
First number in parentheses is from Widmann et at 1998,second number is idemhfier used in USGS national database <br /> Distances and fault rupture lengths were measured on Plate 1 of Quaternary Faidt and Fold Map oJColorado(Widmann et at,1999),except for (1)the geometry of the unnamed faults in Granby basin,which is from Plate 2 of Unruh et al(1996a),(2)the Mosquito fault, <br /> which is from Plate 1 of Wong et al(2007),and(3)the Williams Fork Mountains fault and the unnamed faults in Williams Fork Valley,which are from Figure 9 of this study Distances are to closest fault surface trace,which are not necessarily the same as rupture distance <br /> and other distance measures used in the ground motion calculations Lengths are measured end-to-end in a straight]me <br /> N=normal fault <br /> SS=strike-slip fault <br /> R=reverse <br /> Preferred characteristic magnitudes were calculated using an average of the Wells and Coppersmith(1994)all slip type relation and the Stirling et al(2002)censored relation <br /> s Preferred dip of 50°,with t 15°,was assuned as a default for typical balm-range style normal faults after Lund(2012),except as noted in comments <br /> 6 "WM"is the weighted mean slip rate of the distribution shown Recurrence models used for all faults gh p except zones were characteristic—0 6,maximum magnitude—0 3,and truncated exponential—0 1 For zones,equal weight was given to truncated exponential and <br /> characteristic models <br />