Laserfiche WebLink
Revegetation Assessment <br /> Guanella Reservoir <br /> Clear Creek County,Colorado <br /> was added per the reclamation plan. The reclaimed area of Phase II consists of a mostly level terrace at <br /> approximately the same elevation as the adjacent terrace to the south that was not disturbed by mining <br /> (U.S.Geological Survey 1958). <br /> Table 1. High altitude, low growth seed mix. <br /> Grasses P (%)of 1bx <br /> Ephraim Crested Wheatgrass 30 <br /> Dwarf Perennial Ryegrass 25 <br /> SR3200 Blue Fescue 20 <br /> Reubens Canada Bluegrass 15 <br /> Chewings Fescue 10 <br /> Source:DMG 112 Permit#M-77-534-TR1 <br /> On the western edge of Phase II, including the project area,th terrace shallowly slopes down to the <br /> parking lot below the reservoir dam (outside of the Phase II reclaimed area). The unvegetated salt- <br /> crusted area occurs at the bottom of the slope and extends about one-third up the slope. Patches of <br /> vegetation occur around the unvegetated area. <br /> On March 2, 2018, Denise Larson with ERO visited the project area to assess existing conditions and take <br /> soil samples (2018 site visit). Most of the project area is unvegetated with a salt crust on the surface. <br /> Crested wheatgrass (Agropyron cristatum)and kochia (Bassia scoparia)were observed around the salt- <br /> crusted areas and in the Phase II areas to the east. In the September 2017 inspection report, perennial <br /> ryegrass and Canada bluegrass was also observed. In nearby areas of native vegetation, western <br /> wheatgrass(Pascopyrum smithii)and a brome(Bromus sp.)were common. A soil sample was taken in <br /> the project area (S2). To compare the soils in the unvegetated project area to vegetated portions of the <br /> reclaimed Phase II, another soil sample(Si) was taken. Both samples followed Colorado State University <br /> Soil, Water,and Plant Testing Laboratories (CSU Soil Testing Lab) Instructions (CSU 2018)except that <br /> only the top 3 or 4 inches were sampled because the soil below that depth was frozen. The soil samples <br /> were submitted to the CSU Soil Testing Lab for routine sampling(pH, salts, organic matter, NO3, P, K,Zn, <br /> Fe, Cu, Mn, B lime,and texture estimates) plus Sodium Evaluation (SAR). <br /> Results <br /> The results from the CSU Soil Testing Lab show that the soils in the project area (S1) are very high in salts <br /> and high in sodium,which would severely reduce plant growth (Appendix A). The pH is suitable for plant <br /> growth, and the organic matter amount is more than 2 percent(2.6 percent),which is suitable for <br /> growing native vegetation (Munshower 1993). Where vegetation is growing(S2),the pH and salt levels <br /> in the soil are acceptable, although the pH at 8.1 is basic and may be unsuitable for some plant species. <br /> 3 <br />