Laserfiche WebLink
Data Recovery Report for Three Sites at the Collom Project Colowyo Coal Company <br />1.0 PROJECT AND UNDERTAKING DESCRIPTION <br />In 2017, Colowyo Coal Company L.P. (Colowyo) began constructing the haul road and associated <br />facilities for the Collom Expansion Project (Project). As part of the Project, Tetra Tech was <br />contracted to provide archaeological monitoring services for Elk Ridge Mining and Reclamation, <br />LLC (Elk Ridge) on the behalf of Colowyo. Elk Ridge requested the archaeological monitoring be <br />conducted for all topsoil stripping within the permit boundary in accordance with Exhibit 5, Item 3 - <br />Cultural Resource Protection Plan for the Collom Mine Expansion. The plan was filed by Colowyo <br />to the Office of Surface Mining, Reclamation, and Enforcement (OSMRE) as part of Colowyo's <br />project mine permit. <br />On July 26, 2017, prehistoric site 5MF.8393 (field number BK -1-072617) was discovered by a <br />Tetra Tech archaeological monitor during topsoil stripping activities along the haul road <br />disturbance footprint west of Wilson Creek. On August 23, 2017, prehistoric sites 5MF.8394 and <br />5MF.8395 (field numbers MK -1-082317 and MK -2-082317) were discovered by Tetra Tech <br />archaeological monitors during topsoil stripping activities within the haul road disturbance footprint <br />at the Moffat County Road 51 crossing and immediately west of Wilson Creek. In accordance with <br />Exhibit 5, Item 3; topsoil stripping activities were stopped within 100 feet (ft) [30 meters (m)] of <br />each discovery and each site was flagged for avoidance. Tetra Tech produced a notification report <br />for Colowyo to submit for review to OSMRE; Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety <br />(DRMS); and Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (OAHP). The sites could not be <br />avoided by the Project and faced complete removal. OSMRE, in consultation with DRMS and <br />OAHP, determined the Project would cause an adverse impact to each site in the form of complete <br />removal of any additional data potential. The data potential was argued to be in the form of the <br />remains of intact man-made features and a significant the potential for additional subsurface <br />cultural components to occur at each of the discoveries. The consulted agencies requested the <br />development of a historic properties treatment plan (HPTP) to mitigate the adverse effects. Tetra <br />Tech produced two HPTPs with Site 5MF.8393 (Karpinski 2017a) being first discovered and sites <br />5MF.8394 and 5MF.8395 (Karpinski 2017b) being discovered second. Each HPTP was reviewed <br />and approved by Colowyo, OSMRE, DRMS, and OAHP prior to data recovery field work <br />commencing at any of the sites. <br />The discovery areas had been subjected to Class III cultural resource inventory in 2005 and no <br />cultural resources were observed on the ground surface at each location (Lowe et al. 2006). Prior <br />to ground disturbance, Tetra Tech's archaeological monitors walked the disturbance footprint for <br />the haul road and did not observe any surface cultural resources. The discovered sites are near <br />the previously recorded Site 5MF.1652. The site is located to the north and west outside the <br />disturbance area on top of a low knoll immediately east of Moffat County Road 51. The site was <br />recorded as a prehistoric artifact scatter with features that was originally recorded in 1983 and <br />revisited in 2005 and 2015 (Lowe et al. 2006 and Karpinski and Dugmore 2016). OAHP lists the <br />site's National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) status as Needs Data pending further <br />investigation. The previously recorded site's boundary is completely outside of the Project's <br />disturbance footprint and away from the discoveries. The three discoveries are similar in character <br />and makeup, but are not being considered extensions of the previously recorded site. <br />1.1 Environmental Setting <br />1.1.1 Project Setting <br />The Project is situated in the Southern Rocky Mountain physiographic province among a series <br />of long broad northeast/southwest-trending ridges that make up the Danforth Hills. (Fennerman <br />1931; Thombury 1965). The Project extends into the southern part of the Axial Basin in the north. <br />Tetra Tech February 2018 <br />