Laserfiche WebLink
October 19, 2017 <br />Table 7. Water Discharge Pipeline Design Data: Scenario 1 <br />Pipeline Leg <br />Pipeline <br />Length <br />ft <br />Flow Rate <br />Pipeline <br />Elevation Head <br />Difference <br />ft <br />West Side <br />Well 8to Well? <br />1,175 <br />15 <br />22 <br />Well 7 to Well 6 <br />750 <br />30 <br />-27 <br />Well 6to Wells <br />2,160 <br />45 <br />-226 <br />Well 5toWell4 <br />1,805 <br />60 <br />3 <br />Well 4to Well3 <br />1,680 <br />75 <br />-14 <br />Well 3 to Well 2 <br />1,315 <br />90 <br />3 <br />Well 2 to Well 1 <br />2,075 <br />105 <br />-43 <br />Well 1 to Tank <br />2,210 <br />120 <br />100 <br />East Side <br />1,375 <br />15 <br />288 <br />Well 9 to Well 10 <br />1,250 <br />15 <br />264 <br />Well 10 to Well 11 <br />3,650 <br />30 <br />-101 <br />Well 11 to Tank <br />560 <br />45 <br />-25 <br />Table 8. Water Discharge Pipeline Design Data: Scenario 2 <br />Pipeline Leg <br />Pipeline <br />Length <br />ft <br />ElowRate <br />Pipeline <br />Elevation Head <br />Difference <br />ft <br />West Side <br />Well 7to Well6 <br />1,370 <br />15 <br />18 <br />Well 6to Wells <br />3,075 <br />30 <br />-298 <br />Well 5toWell4 <br />1,813 <br />45 <br />3 <br />Well 4 to Well 3 <br />1,680 <br />60 <br />-14 <br />Well to Well <br />1,315 <br />75 <br />3 <br />Well 2to Well 1 <br />2,125 <br />90 <br />43 <br />Well 1 to Tank <br />2,080 <br />120 <br />100 <br />East Side <br />Well 8 to Well <br />1,375 <br />15 <br />288 <br />Well 9to Well 10 <br />4,280 <br />30 <br />-158 <br />Well 10 to Tank <br />500 <br />45 <br />-25 <br />Page 45 <br />The discharge pipelines in Figures 8a and 8b were sized based on the maximum flow in <br />each leg of the pipeline. A single diameter of 4 inches was chosen for convenience. Shock <br />losses from bends, expansions, and tees were ignored as they are much smaller than the static <br />losses due to the lengths of the pipes in each run. The sizes of the pipes for each pipe run were <br />presented in Tables 9 and 10 for Scenarios 1 and 2, respectively. <br />Agapito Associates, Inc. <br />