My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-03-26_PERMIT FILE - M2017049 (6)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2017049
>
2018-03-26_PERMIT FILE - M2017049 (6)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/17/2021 11:38:35 AM
Creation date
3/27/2018 11:00:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2017049
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
3/26/2018
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Transit Mix Concrete Co.
To
DRMS
Email Name
AME
WHE
PSH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hitch Rack Ranch Pit Wall Geotechnical Assessment—Supplemental CDRMS Response <br /> NORWEST 65018 <br /> March 2 ,218 <br /> COR PORAT ION Page <br /> constructed from the major rock types based on the block model geology. This analysis conservatively <br /> considers saturated groundwater conditions(disturbance factor=0). The alignment of the selected cross- <br /> section is shown in Appendix A. <br /> Currently,the available drillhole data is limited to the vicinity of the Phase 1 pit slopes. The ultimate wall <br /> heights for the proposed quarry range from approximately 300ft to 500ft. A preliminary overall pit wall <br /> angle of 45*has been considered and consequently modelled to confirm that factor of safety requirements <br /> as highlighted in Table are satisfied. <br /> Table 1 <br /> Design Criteria,Overall Slope <br /> Static FOS?1.5 <br /> Limit Equilibrium <br /> Pseudo-Static FOS>_1.1 <br /> 7 <br /> *FOS=Factor of Safety. <br /> Limit equilibrium analyses shows the proposed 45 degree pit slopes for Phase 1 pit have FOS values greater <br /> than 2 for both static and pseudo-static conditions even assuming fully saturated wall conditions <br /> (conservative groundwater assumption). Appendix 1 contains printouts of the stability analysis results. <br /> Note that both circular failure and block specified failure surface were examined to determine the <br /> sensitivity of the results to the shape of the failure surface. In all cases examined, the FOS exceed the <br /> design criteria. <br /> Pit walls constructed at 45°from horizontal are adequate to satisfy the above design criteria for the Phase <br /> 1 cross-section under the conditions considered. The use of a 45 degree inter-ramp wall configuration can <br /> also be used as a design guideline for the ultimate pit slopes in order to determine the disturbance area <br /> for reclamation bonding. Detailed design of the Phase 2 and subsequent quarry walls can be completed <br /> as additional geotechnical drilling and rock mass characterization is completed in the proposed quarry <br /> area. Pit walls in excess of 250-300 feet may have slightly shallower overall slopes as ramps or a wider <br /> inter-stack catch bench configurations are incorporated into the wall design. <br /> 4. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> 4.1. Overall Pit Slope Design <br /> A cross-section through the highest area of the Phase 1 pit wall was analyzed using slope stability <br /> software to check the factors of safety for both static and pseudo-static conditions. An overall pit <br /> wall angle of 45* was considered under saturated conditions and results show that this <br /> configuration satisfies the design criteria. <br /> For preliminary design purposes, it is recommended that overall quarry pit slopes do not exceed <br /> 45*from horizontal. The current drillhole data supports the development of the Phase 1 pit slopes. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.