My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-03-15_REVISION - M2008017
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2008017
>
2018-03-15_REVISION - M2008017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:35:23 PM
Creation date
3/21/2018 9:22:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2008017
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/15/2018
Doc Name Note
Preliminary Review
Doc Name
Preliminary Review
From
DRMS
To
J&T Consulting, Inc.
Type & Sequence
AM1
Email Name
ECS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JRT Consulting, Inc. <br />March 15, 2018 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />(slurry wall, topsoil and overburden stockpiles, plant and scale locations, buildings, typical mining <br />section, dewatering pond, etc.). <br />EXHIBIT D - Minina Plan (Rule 6.4.4): The fourth paragraph of Exhibit D states that setbacks of less <br />than 200' may be used for structures with existing surface use agreements/damage waiver agreements. <br />Please specify in detail what structures/agreements are being referred to (this information may also be <br />provided as part of Exhibit S). DRMS notes that prior damage waiver agreements have been obtained from <br />the City of Greeley, DCP Midstream, and Loloff Construction as provided in Exhibit S. <br />DBMS considers that the entire proposed permit area is potentially affected area at this time. No evidence <br />has been provided that any structure owners (other than the three listed above) inside, or within 200', of the <br />existing or proposed permit area have been provided with damage waiver agreements. This demonstration <br />is required by DBMS prior to acceptance of a geotechnical stability exhibit such as the one provided for the <br />first four phases of the proposed operation (See comments for Exhibit S for further information). DRMS <br />cannot approve the permit amendment unless/until all structure owners within and within 200' of the <br />proposed permit area are provided with damage waiver agreements. <br />EXHIBIT E - Reclamation Plan Rule 6.4.5: If the proposed lined reservoirs lie within the flood -plain, <br />the operator will need to install engineered inlet/outlet structures to protect the integrity of the liner during a <br />flood event. <br />If pumping/water control features associated with the developed water resource will be constructed prior to <br />release of the permit as proposed here, the permittee will be required to submit a detailed engineered design <br />for these features either as part of this amendment or through a Technical Revision prior to construction. <br />Cost for construction of these features will need to be included in the reclamation bond. These requirements <br />also apply to the required engineered flood control structures, and installation of a perimeter drain/French <br />drain to control groundwater levels around areas enclosed by the proposed slurry walls. Please <br />acknowledge. <br />EXHIBIT G - Water Information (Rule 6.4.7): Due to the potential impacts to the surrounding <br />groundwater table from the proposed operation, a groundwater monitoring plan will be required to be <br />submitted to DRMS and approved prior to exposure of groundwater at the site. Additional monitoring well <br />locations will likely be required to monitor for potential off-site impacts to groundwater levels resulting <br />from the proposed site activities. <br />The required groundwater monitoring plan shall include, at a minimum: <br />1) Map depicting the locations of all current and proposed groundwater monitoring Iocations associated <br />with this site. <br />2) Boring logs/well construction diagrams for all current groundwater monitoring wells associated with <br />this site and future wells after installation. <br />3) Monitoring data collection and reporting methods and frequency. <br />4) Summary of any existing data available from current monitoring well locations and any nearby <br />accessible monitoring or domestic wells that will help characterize the background conditions, historic <br />water levels and seasonal fluctuations, and groundwater flow direction in the vicinity of the site. <br />5) Proposed "trigger levels" for each well that will identify when groundwater impacts (rise or fall) have <br />reached levels that will require reporting to DRMS, and may require additional monitoring or mitigation <br />actions. <br />6) Proposed mitigation actions that may be implemented if impacts to groundwater are observed <br />consistently above trigger levels, or off-site impacts are observed. <br />7) The permittee will also be required to demonstrate that they are in compliance with the requirements of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.