Laserfiche WebLink
years with some years at lower levels and others at higher concentrations but all within historical <br />range for sulfate from this well. Sulfate concentrations in well GP -8 have stayed steady and small as <br />mining approaches this area. <br />Sulfate concentrations for the HI aquifer wells are presented in Figures B-11 and B-12. The <br />sulfate concentrations in the HI aquifer wells in Figure B-11 are fairly similar except for the values <br />in backfill well GF -7, which are substantially greater than those in downgradient well GF -4. Steady <br />sulfate concentrations have been observed in well GF -4 after a very gradual increase for several <br />years. These small variations are well within the natural variation of sulfate concentrations in the HI <br />aquifer but could be defining the very small effects of the backfill aquifer upgradient. Sulfate <br />concentrations in backfill well GF -7 overall gradually declined in 2010 through 2014 and overall <br />steady in 2015 through 2017. The water levels for the last few years have been fairly similar in well <br />GF -7, indicating that these changes are not due to new backfill being saturated but likely due to <br />variations in recharge. Sulfate concentrations have stayed low and steady in backfill well GF -5 in <br />2017. These small changes may be defining the very small effects of upgradient mining but the <br />changes are well within natural ranges. This monitoring indicates that if the HI aquifer has been <br />affected in wells GF -4 and GF -5 by upgradient mining, it has been very small. <br />Sulfate concentrations in well GMP -1, which are shown on Figure B-12, have been highly <br />variable indicating an increasing trend during 2006 and 2007 and an overall similar increasing trend <br />in 2008 through 2017. The water level in well GMP -1 had been steadily increasing for several years <br />prior to becoming fairly steady in 2002 and then gradually increasing for several years prior to being <br />steady the last five years. Sulfate concentrations may stay higher and variable in this well for several <br />years. Sulfate concentrations in this well should be influenced by the sulfate concentrations in the <br />backfill aquifer upgradient of GMP -1. The sulfate concentrations in well GP -3 had shown a gradual <br />Trapper Mining Company 3-6 <br />2017 Annual Report <br />