Laserfiche WebLink
<br />However, when reviewing Exhibit 7-23 Figure D4, the designs show the temporary access roads as <br />graveled. Please update Exhibit 7-23 Figure D4. <br /> <br />6. In proposed Exhibit 13C, there appears to be table numbering duplication as well missing table <br />numbers associated with the exhibit. Table 13C-13 has been associated with two diff erent tables and <br />Table 13C-24 has been associated with three different tables. Please provide a reasoning for this or <br />update the Table numbering. <br /> <br />7. Table 13C-3 has been excluded from Exhibit 13C. Discussion on page 3 states Tables 13C-1 through <br />13C-6 present required items and associated volumetrics to reclaim the Collom Haul Road. Not <br />included in this is Table 13C-7 Revegetation Requirements for the Collom Haul Road . It appears to <br />the Division that a numbering shift may have happened with the tables. Please either update the <br />Tables or the discussion referring to the Collom Haul Road tasks. <br /> <br />8. Proposed Topsoil Pile 36A has been included in the cumulative bond schedule, Exhibit 13C. When <br />reviewing proposed Map 28C – Topsoil Handling, all topsoil associated with proposed Topsoil Pile <br />36A is to be stripped and placed back to the dated mining block of 2022 – 2024. However, as <br />discussed with the pending Renewal No. 7 process, the Division will be bonding for all disturbances <br />associated with current disturbances as well as up to the current permit term (years 2017 – 2021) <br />with pending Renewal No. 7. Please provide the Division additional explanation for the inclusion of <br />Topsoil Pile 36A within Exhibit 13C. <br /> <br />9. On proposed page 13 of Exhibit 13C, discussion states that the provided information is through the <br />end of year 2020. Similarly to Item 8 of this letter, the Division will be bonding for all disturbances <br />associated with current disturbances as well as up to the current permit term (years 2017 – 2021) <br />with pending Renewal No. 7. The Division feels that the differing dates can lead to confusion with <br />the reclamation cost estimate with no defining disturbance limits associated with 2020 within the <br />Colowyo PAP. Please provide defining disturbance limits for the disturbances associated with the <br />proposed activities within Exhibit 13C. <br /> <br />10. Please include the Haul Road Crossing within Exhibit 13C. <br /> <br />11. The Division is currently having internal network issues which isn’t allowing the Division to <br />generate an updated reclamation cost estimate. The Division will provide this estimate to Colowyo <br />with a future adequacy letter as soon as possible. <br /> <br />If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at any time. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br /> <br />