My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-03-09_ENFORCEMENT - M2004031
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Enforcement
>
Minerals
>
M2004031
>
2018-03-09_ENFORCEMENT - M2004031
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2021 7:42:04 PM
Creation date
3/12/2018 4:17:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2004031
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
3/9/2018
Doc Name Note
Hearing Exhibits
Doc Name
Pages 71 - 134
From
Aggregate Industries
To
DRMS
Email Name
JLE
WHE
CMM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' EXHIBIT 22 <br /> ' and sluice gates to control flows to the drain. The drain sluice gates will be closed when the Fulton Ditch <br /> is releasing water to the Bull Seep. This will allow the historic flow pattern of the Bull Seep to continue <br /> ' and prevent the water from entering the City of Thornton reservoir. When the releases from the Bull Seep <br /> end the sluice gates will be opened and the lingering Bull Seep surface water that causes the rise in <br /> groundwater levels will be drained back to the Bull Seep via the City of Thornton reservoir. Stop logs are <br /> included in the design to allow the "fine-tuning" of the water levels and flow rates to the drain. This is <br /> necessary to maintain the jurisdictional wetlands in the area of the Orr property. <br /> Tetra Tech evaluated the possibility of preparing a groundwater model to aid in the design of the Plan. <br /> However, any practical groundwater model would not have sufficient accuracy and precision to aid the <br /> design. Given that the elevations of pre-mining groundwater within a foot of the ground surface adjacent <br /> to the Orr property, the accuracy of the model simulations would not have been sufficient to predict the <br /> changes in water level from the Plan. Consequently, Al proposes to use an observational approach that <br /> ' includes monthly motoring of groundwater levels and staff gage measurements. Existing staff gauges and <br /> Monitoring wells HZMW-2, HZMW11A, and HZMW-11B will be monitored. <br /> ' BACKGROUND <br /> Tetra Tech has reviewed the hydrologic information available for the area of the Orr property to develop a <br /> plan that will restore the hydrologic regime, to the extent practical, to the pre-mining condition. The <br /> available information includes: water level information for the monitoring wells adjacent to the Orr <br /> ' property, the location of the 100-year floodplain, the presence of wetlands, surface water drainage <br /> features and drainage easements. The available information indicates that the western 1/2 to 2/3 of the <br /> Orr property is within the 100-year floodplain and the property likely contained wetlands prior to <br /> construction of the slurry wall (Figure 1). The Bull Seep is a major source of surface water and <br /> groundwater in the area of the Orr property. The Bull Seep is sourced from a turnout on Fulton Ditch <br /> south of 1041h Avenue and from a turnout at the southwest property line of the Orr property (See Figure 1). <br /> ' Water is generally released from the Fulton Ditch to the Bull Seep during winter months, but the water <br /> may be released at any time of year depending on the operating of the ditch. The Bull Seep water has <br /> historically flowed adjacent to the Orr property and contributed to the formation of jurisdictional wetlands. <br /> Likewise, seepage losses from the Fulton Ditch and groundwater from the uplands to the east likely <br /> contributed to the formation of the jurisdictional wetlands. <br /> ' Groundwater Levels <br /> Figures 4 through 6 are hydrographs of water level measurements in monitoring wells HZMW-2, HZMW- <br /> 11A and HZMW-11 B, respectively. These wells were chosen because they are the closest wells to the <br /> ' property and are most representative of historic, current and future groundwater levels. Water level <br /> measurements in well HZMW 3 were reviewed for this study. However, well 3 is east of the Fulton Ditch <br /> and much further from the slurry wall and the Orr property. Consequently, the data from this well is less <br /> useful than wells 2 and 11A and 11B and not presented in this study. <br /> The historic period of record for wells 2, 11 A and 11 B is February 2004 to May 2007, Recent <br /> ' measurements were made on June 7, 2016. The hydrographs have been annotated to show: the ground <br /> ' 2 Tetra Tech <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.