Laserfiche WebLink
-J� <br /> Transit Mix Concrete Co. <br /> 16) In Figure C-2, groundwater monitoring wells MW-LTC-2 and MW-LTC-6 are shown to be <br /> located outside of the proposed permit boundary. However, in Exhibit G and in other <br /> figures submitted with the application, these wells are described as being located within the <br /> proposed permit boundary. Please correct this error on Figure C-2. <br /> Response: The locations of the groundwater monitoring wells have been adjusted to the <br /> correct locations in Figure C-2. These wells are both located within the proposed permit <br /> boundary. <br /> 17) In most of the Exhibit C figures, the proposed permit boundary and affected land boundary <br /> are indicated with a dashed line. In some areas, particularly in the eastern portion of <br /> Section 16 where the boundaries have several curves, it is difficult to determine the exact <br /> location of the boundaries and their relationship with nearby features and each other due to <br /> the line spacing. For these particular boundaries, the Division recommends the Applicant <br /> use solid rather than dashed lines for better clarity. Alternatively, the Applicant may submit <br /> a separate Exhibit C figure showing a closer view of Section 16, with the proposed permit <br /> boundary and affected land boundary indicated with solid lines. <br /> Response: The Exhibit C figures have been revised to show the permit and affected land <br /> boundaries with solid lines. The display orders and line widths on all the figures have been <br /> revised to more clearly present the information. <br /> 18) In Figures C-4 through C-9, the northeast pit crest appears to be located very close to the <br /> proposed affected land boundary, particularly at the northeastern corner of the proposed <br /> plant area. Please specify the minimum distance the proposed pit crest will be maintained <br /> from the proposed affected land boundary. <br /> Response: There is typically 50 feet between the pit crest and the affected land boundary. <br /> This buffer area is reduced to a minimum of 34 feet in the plant area to keep the affected <br /> land boundary away from the Little Turkey Creek riparian corridor. Regardless of the <br /> affected lands boundary location, there are no planned disturbances in the area between the <br /> plant/pit and Little Turkey Creek. <br /> 19) In Figures C-6 through C-8, the TS 1 topsoil stockpile appears to extend north past the pit <br /> crest. However, in Figures C-4 and C-5,the TS 1 stockpile is shown to be located within the <br /> pit/plant area. Please explain this discrepancy or correct any errors on the appropriate <br /> figure(s). <br /> Response: The TS 1 topsoil stockpile boundary will be wholly within the plant/pit <br /> boundary. The Exhibit C figures have been revised to more clearly present the topsoil <br /> stockpile location. <br /> 20) Please provide clarification on how the TS 1 topsoil stockpile will be protected from any <br /> disturbances caused by plant operations. <br /> Hitch Rack Ranch Quarry(M-2017-049) <br /> Response to Comments—March 9,2018 <br />