My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-01-03_PERMIT FILE - C1981010A (12)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2018-01-03_PERMIT FILE - C1981010A (12)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/4/2023 2:28:36 PM
Creation date
3/9/2018 6:59:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/3/2018
Doc Name
pages 2-58 to 2-169
Section_Exhibit Name
2.3 Vegetation & 2.4 Fish and Wildlife
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
134
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.3.6 PR -7 Mine Expansion Area Vesetation <br />Baseline vegetation sampling was conducted during the summer of 2014 on the approximately 795.71 <br />acre PR -7 Mine Expansion Area. This area is located adjacent to the eastern boundary of the 1981 <br />Trapper Mine permit area and west of Moffat County Road # 33, also known as the Knez Divide Road. <br />The vegetation sampling effort was conducted in accordance with the baseline vegetation sampling <br />requirements of Rule 2.04.10 of the Regulations of the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board for <br />Coal Mining (effective 8/30/1980, last revised 9/14/2005). <br />2.3.6.1 Methods for Data Collection and Analyses <br />Vegetation Mapping. For the PR -7 Mine Expansion Area vegetation sampling effort in 2014 a detailed <br />map was prepared in accordance with Rule 2.04.10(1), which requires that plant communities be <br />delineated based on visually dominant plant species. The vegetation mapping was initially prepared <br />using high resolution aerial photographs taken in the fall of 2013, with minor adjustments to the <br />photographic mapping made based upon extensive experience in the PR -7 Mine Expansion Area. The <br />boundaries of smaller vegetation blocks within the PR -7 Mine Expansion Area were delineated with a <br />Trimble Model Geo XH GPS unit as the investigators walked these boundaries. <br />The detailed delineation of the vegetation types found within the PR -7 Mine Expansion Area is shown <br />on Map 48A. This map shows the extent of vegetation types that could be affected and the location of <br />each vegetation transect used to evaluate plant cover, herbaceous production, and shrub density <br />within the proposed mine expansion area. The vegetation boundaries of all lands located within one- <br />half mile of the PR -7 Mine Expansion Area also are shown on this map. <br />Vegetation Sampling. The specific sampling methodologies used in this evaluation followed the <br />procedures found in CDRMS' "Guidelines with Land Use and Vegetation Requirements of the <br />Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board for Coal Mining" issued in June of 1988 (Vegetation <br />Guideline); the "Guideline for the Management of Noxious Weeds on Coal Mine Permit Areas" <br />issued in 1990; and the "Guidelines Regarding Selected Coal Mine Bond Release Issues" issued April <br />18, 1995. Finally, the "Proposed Revisions to the Rules and Regulations of the Colorado Mined Land <br />Reclamation Board for Coal Mining" dated May 13, 2014; Rule 4.15.11; and corresponding <br />documents were used to provide guidance on sample adequacy calculations and statistical <br />comparisons. <br />Prior to starting the field sampling, the proposed sampling and data analysis methods were discussed <br />with, and approved by, the CDRMS. The CDRMS indicated that it was not necessary to submit copies <br />of the raw field data sheets, but that this information should be kept in the TMI files in the event that <br />the CDRMS determined that they needed to review this information. <br />TMI is proposing to continue to use the currently approved revegetation technical standards in the PR - <br />7 Mine Expansion Area. Therefore, the field data collected in 2014 followed methodologies similar to <br />those used to collect the historic baseline vegetation data. This allowed for comparison between the <br />historic data and current data. Because the original permit standards were used, there are some <br />minor differences in the sampling and analysis methodologies used here from those currently <br />recommended by the CDRMS. <br />For each of the major plant communities, all of the field data were analyzed in terms of "total plant <br />cover" to determine whether sample adequacy was achieved prior to leaving the site being sampled. <br />For production sampling, a minimum of 30 samples were collected and the green plant weight data <br />2-122a ;- �!ision: /OR -08 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.