My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-01-03_PERMIT FILE - C1981010A (12)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2018-01-03_PERMIT FILE - C1981010A (12)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/4/2023 2:28:36 PM
Creation date
3/9/2018 6:59:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/3/2018
Doc Name
pages 2-58 to 2-169
Section_Exhibit Name
2.3 Vegetation & 2.4 Fish and Wildlife
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
134
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Reference to Table 2.3-15 shows that shrub species Symphoricarpos oreophilus is <br />an important understory shrub in range sites A and B and is co -dominant with Ar- <br />temisia tridentata in range site C. The overstory shrubs with the highest den- <br />sity in range sites A and B are Quercus gambellii and Amelanchier alnifolia. The <br />stem density of Q. gambellii is 3.26 stems per square meter in range site B and <br />1.64 stems per square meter in range site A. Approximately twice as many Q. gam- <br />bellii stems per square meter are found on the west facing mountain shrub slopes. <br />The density of Amelanchier alnifolia in range site A and B is about equal. Table <br />2.3-9 indicates that the total mean stem density for range sites A and B are <br />approximately equal, i.e. 8.54 stems per square meter for range site A and 8.92 <br />stems per square meter for range site B. Two other shrubs which are to be con- <br />sidered subdominants in range sites A and B are Artemisia tridentata and Prunus <br />virginiana. <br />• 2.3.3.4 Diversit <br />Two different diversity indices were calculated for each range site. Generally, <br />only one diversity index was calculated for the entire range of lifeforms present <br />in a plant community. Since diversity index is calculated from some measured <br />parameter such as cover, production or density, a single index for an entire com- <br />munity requires that a common parameter be measured for all species or lifeforms <br />present. However, since the test for success of shrub reestablishment will be <br />based on density and the test for success of reestablishment of herbaceous spe- <br />cies will be based on production or cover, no one common parameter exists. <br />Therefore, it was decided to obtain an index for all herbaceous species based on <br />cover and an index for all shrubby species based on density. Such a method does <br />not favor either overstory or understory vegetation. Instead it provides a bet- <br />ter balance for establishing a diversified, stable post mine vegetative commun- <br />ity. <br />2-105 <br />In essence, <br />the diversity index <br />suggested by Bonham <br />(1980) is <br />really <br />a dominance <br />. <br />measure. It <br />does not take into <br />consideration how <br />individuals <br />of a <br />species are <br />2-105 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.