Laserfiche WebLink
Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board <br /> Page 10 <br /> March 2, 2018 <br /> -Species Mixture Percent <br /> Intermediate Wheatgrass 30% <br /> Slender Wheatgrass 25% <br /> Pubescent Wheatgrass 25% <br /> Russian Wildrye 10% <br /> Western Wheatgrass 10% <br /> *Seed mixes will be designed to accomplish an application rate of 65 seeds per square foot. <br /> 5. Wildlife <br /> a. Concerns that wildlife protection measures are inadequate. (13) <br /> With LRM's response to the Division's first adequacy review they provided details regarding how <br /> wildlife will be protected near the mining operation and processing sites. These measures include the <br /> following: <br /> • phased mining plan with concurrent reclamation <br /> • buffer zone around the Little Cache La Poudre Ditch <br /> • safety berms around the pit excavations <br /> • provide locations for egress from the pit area <br /> • ten mile per hour speed limit for mine traffic <br /> • Applicant has submitted a raptor nest monitoring and mitigation plan <br /> By conducting concurrent mining and reclamation,the Applicant will limit the amount of land disturbed <br /> by the mining operation and allow wildlife to utilize un-mined areas and reclaimed areas throughout the <br /> life of the operation. Colorado Parks and Wildlife(CPW) did not provide the Division comments during <br /> the comment period regarding the operation in accordance with Rule 6.4.8(2). However, the Division <br /> consulted with Shane Craig, District Wildlife Manager with CPW. Mr. Craig indicated CPW does not <br /> anticipate any negative impact to wildlife at this time from the proposed project. The Division finds the <br /> Applicant has adequately addressed the requirements of Rule 6.4.8 and Rule 3.1.8. <br /> b. Concerns regarding the potential for wildlife poisoning by the consumption of reclaimed <br /> vegetation that has increased Selenium (Se) levels. (12) <br /> The objectors raise the concern that reclaimed vegetation established closer to the Pierre Shale bedrock <br /> poses a risk of Selenium(Se)poisoning to wild and domesticated animals. The objectors cited a study <br /> (McDowell et al. 2005) to substantiate this claim. According to the study,three experiments were <br /> conducted on sheep to evaluate the maximum tolerance levels of Se. Based on the findings of the report <br /> Selenium toxicosis was not found in any experiment. LRM plans to cover the reclaimed area and pit floor <br /> with three feet of cover material and growth medium. LRM argues the Pierre Shale has low hydraulic <br /> conductivity and is relatively dry and that the mechanism for moving constituents upward into the cover <br /> material will be by the slow process of molecular diffusion. Regardless, LRM has committed to sampling <br />