2018-01-03_PERMIT FILE - C1981010 ‎(8)‎

• Permit No: C1981010
• IBM Index Class Name: Permit File
• Doc Date: 1/3/2018
• Doc Name: Test Excavation of Site 5MF7762 by Grand River Institute BLM LSFO No. 11.2.2016
• Section_Exhibit Name: Appendix K Part K-XVI
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

All measurements in centimeters
KEY: TP = test pit; TT = test trench; ST = shovel test; AT = auger test ss = sandstone, F = fine, C = course; S = smooth; M =
moderate; R = rough; G = grinding; P = pecking; Ch = chipping; Frag = fragment; Wh = whole; Y = yes; N = no; NA = not
applicable
References
Adams, Jenny L.
2002 Groundstone Analysis, A Technological Approach. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.
A.23
M
c
Comments
3
a
V
;C
U
6NOE
FS 212
10.7
10.1
4.2
sandstone
F
F
Frag
N
Possible metate or netherstone groundstone fragment
with smooth surface and less than 15 peck marks
6NOE
FS 231
23.5
16.2
2.2
sandstone
F
NA
Frag
Y
Oxidized sandstone netherstone fragment with moderate
use wear and light pecking primarily confined to the
central aspect of the artifact. Scratch marks secondary to
excavation.
ST 5
FS 216
12.8
6.0
3.4
sandstone
F
R
Frag
Y
Oxidized mano fragment with multi surface heavy,
course pecking and bifacially smoothed surfaces.
6NOE
FS 218
8.1
6.4
5.1
quartzite
C
NA
Wh
N
Quartz cobble hammerstone with heavy use wear on
each end
TP 3
FS 221
4.0
2.7
1.1
sandstone
F
F
Frag
Y
Possible small fragment of groundstone as indicated by
smooth flat surface
6NOE
FS 228
8.8
9.7
2.9
siltstone
F
M
Wh
N
Crude cobble chopper with minimal use wear
All measurements in centimeters
KEY: TP = test pit; TT = test trench; ST = shovel test; AT = auger test ss = sandstone, F = fine, C = course; S = smooth; M =
moderate; R = rough; G = grinding; P = pecking; Ch = chipping; Frag = fragment; Wh = whole; Y = yes; N = no; NA = not
applicable
References
Adams, Jenny L.
2002 Groundstone Analysis, A Technological Approach. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.
A.23