My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-01-03_PERMIT FILE - C1981010 (8)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2018-01-03_PERMIT FILE - C1981010 (8)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2018 9:38:25 AM
Creation date
3/2/2018 9:22:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/3/2018
Doc Name
Test Excavation of Site 5MF7762 by Grand River Institute BLM LSFO No. 11.2.2016
Section_Exhibit Name
Appendix K Part K-XVI
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ABSTRACT <br />At the request of Bureau of Land Management Little Snake Field Office (BLM-LSFO), <br />Grand River Institute (GRI) was contracted by Trapper Mining, Inc. to conduct evaluative <br />testing for site 5MF7762. The site was first documented during GRI's Class III Cultural <br />Resources Inventory of a Lease Modification Area for Trapper Mining, Inc. in 2013. Test <br />excavations at the site were conducted intermittently between August and October of 2015. <br />A broadly inclusive testing of the site included auger, small shovel pit, and trench <br />testing. Also, two areas were selected for limited block unit testing due to the presence of <br />suspected thermal features. As a result, the site produced diagnostic artifacts and radiocarbon <br />data from two samples that indicated a Formative Era base camp was established there between <br />about 1000-1100 AD. Other limited use of the site is indicated during the historic period by a <br />third radiocarbon sample, and possible camping also occurred during the Late Archaic and <br />Middle Archaic periods, as indicated by two temporally diagnostic artifacts. However, due to a <br />drying/erosional episode soon after the Formative occupation, the site's cultural deposits were <br />eroded and the observed possible hearth features were completely deflated. Accordingly, the <br />testing indicated that although the site produced chronometric data, it is unlikely to yield <br />additional significant information concerning the prehistory of the region and is field <br />reevaluated as not eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. <br />ii <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.