My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-01-03_PERMIT FILE - C1981010 (8)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2018-01-03_PERMIT FILE - C1981010 (8)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2018 9:38:25 AM
Creation date
3/2/2018 9:22:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/3/2018
Doc Name
Test Excavation of Site 5MF7762 by Grand River Institute BLM LSFO No. 11.2.2016
Section_Exhibit Name
Appendix K Part K-XVI
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the cultural deposits encountered. Table A-2 (Appendix A) is a list of the field specimens that <br />were collected during all phases of the tests. These tables allow for a methodical comparison <br />and contrast of the findings throughout the site, and an overview of the nature, density, <br />location, and extent of the cultural materials recovered — primarily in the form of lithic debitage <br />and oxidized sandstone. The larger scale test excavations — shovel tests and trenches and <br />formal grid -oriented test pits — are described in this section of the report. Auger probes, shovel <br />tests and narrow shovel trenches affected 16 square meters of the site; and, the formal test units <br />occurred within about 2 square meters. <br />9.1 Auger Tests <br />A total of 83 auger tests (ATs) were conducted on, and in the immediate vicinity of the <br />site (Figure 3). The initial array of 28 of these l Ocm-diameter tests were established along <br />north -south and east -west grid lines at 5m intervals as illustrated in Figure 2. It was anticipated <br />that distinct vertical strata would be in evidence in the removed soil samples — including <br />recognizable cultural levels — and, ideally, that cultural features, loci, and/or concentrations of <br />artifacts would be detected. Subsequent excavations in the form of shovel tests and formal <br />excavation units were established on the basis of the auger test results. <br />Initially, all removed auger test fill was screened through a 1/4" shaker screen. Results <br />are listed in Table A-1 (Appendix A). A selection of these tests were screened through a 1/8" <br />mesh as a test in order to ascertain the presence or absence of microflakes or other materials <br />too small to be caught by the larger screen. As is evident from the results of Auger Tests 76 <br />through 83, the finer mesh sieve did, indeed, succeed in isolating small items that were <br />apparently being missed by the 1/4" screen. <br />Although no stratigraphy of note was defined during the auger testing activities, and no <br />definitive thermal features, ash layers, or other cultural manifestations were evident in the <br />removed fill, it was demonstrated that lithic debitage and oxidized sandstone fragments were <br />present at all depths to bedrock and throughout the top of the prominence. <br />9.2 Shovel Tests <br />A series of three intuitively selected shovel tests were excavated on the site in locations <br />where, for a variety of reasons, a more intensive examination of the sub -surface cultural <br />deposits was warranted. All STs were conducted in arbitrary 10cm levels and collected as <br />such. Excavated fill was screened through either 1/8" or 1/4" mesh screen as noted. Unless <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.