My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-02-21_REPORT - C1996083
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1996083
>
2018-02-21_REPORT - C1996083
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2018 7:25:27 AM
Creation date
2/21/2018 1:30:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
2/21/2018
Doc Name
Annual Hydrology Report Adequacy Review Response
From
Bowie Resources, LLC
To
DRMS
Annual Report Year
2016
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
CCW
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2/21/2018 <br />State.co.us Executive Branch Mail - Re: Bowie Resources DH -67B <br />STATE OF DRMS_CoalAdmin - DNR, DNR <dnr drms_coal_admin@state.co.us> <br />'r <br />COLORADO <br />Re: Bowie Resources DH -67B <br />1 message <br />Wein - DNR, Clayton <clayton.wein@state.co.us> Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 12:19 PM <br />To: Basil Bear <BasilBear@bowieresources.com> <br />Cc: Tamme Bishop <tamme.jestover@bresnan.net>, DNR DRMS_CoalAdmin - DNR <dnr—drms—coal_admin@state.co.us> <br />Good afternoon Basil, <br />After reviewing the your email, the AHR data and the response letter to the Division's review of the 2016 AHR; monitoring <br />point DH -67B needs to be repaired to be in compliance with the approved C-1996-083 hydrologic monitoring plan. <br />Please submit to the Division a date and plan description for the repairs to the monitoring location. <br />Thank you, <br />Clayton Wein <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />° <br />COLORADO <br />Division of Reclamation, <br />, <br />Mining and Safety <br />Department of dUalural Peesources <br />P 303.866.3567 x 8144 ( F 303.832.8106 <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215, Denver, CO 80203 <br />clayton.wein@stateocoous I http://mining@stateocoous <br />On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 8:11 AM, Basil Bear <BasilBea r@bowieresources.com> wrote: <br />Clayton: <br />This is in response to your 2 questions regarding DH -67B. <br />1. Have the efforts to use a smaller bailer in well DH -67B been successful? <br />Sometime in the past several years DH -67B had a slight offset, enough of an offset that prevented retrieving a <br />water sample. The offset did not completely close the hole and I have been able get a depth to water <br />measurement. To answer your question, I have attempted to use a total 5 variations of bailers in an attempt to <br />get the sample. The first being my standard bailer, a 1 -inch PVC, approximately 6 -ft bailer. The second a 1 <br />flexible clear tube bailer, third a short flexible hose bailer, the fourth a'/2 -in garden hose and the last a'/ inch <br />flexible tube. There were several problems that I encounter when trying to retrieve the water sample, the first <br />obviously the offset in the hole, but the second is the moisture on the sides of the drill hole. When I try the <br />smaller bailers, which are lighter, the string and bailer itself adheres to the wet sides of the drill hole thus <br />preventing the bailer to get past the offset. In an attempt to get these bailers down the hole I have increased <br />the weight attached to the bailer but that presented a different problem, the weight gets caught in the area of <br />the offset. On numerous occasions I nearly lost the bailer because of this. During my visits to this site I always <br />try to make attempt to collect the sample but with no success, that is until my last visit to the sight in December <br />of last year. <br />2. If it has been successful, how long has the smaller bailer been implemented at the site? <br />As mentioned above, I was able to get one of the 1/2 -in. garden hose bailers down the hole last December, <br />why it worked this time and not in the past I'm not sure. Either the moisture on the sides of the hole was <br />different or there was a change in the offset. Either way a sample was collected. <br />https://mail.google.com/mail/b/AKVXdwzSS3GFhuiMiFayiXVwYONa_zmA_oowV-OVgS3oywmaFmQg/u/0/?ui=2&ik=deb7fOcd20&jsver=nwJUtiz7310.e... 1/2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.