My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-02-16_ENFORCEMENT - M1977311
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Enforcement
>
Minerals
>
M1977311
>
2018-02-16_ENFORCEMENT - M1977311
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2018 11:41:58 AM
Creation date
2/16/2018 11:09:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977311
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
2/16/2018
Doc Name Note
Objectors' Response to Cotter's Motion on Burden of Proof
Doc Name
Objectors' Response to Cotter's Motion on Burden of Proof
From
INFORM
To
MLRB
Email Name
CMM
LJW
GRM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3 <br /> <br />requested a hearing before this Board. See, e.g., JD-6 application letter dated November 22, <br />2017 (“To obtain approval of the second five-year period of temporary cessation and as directed <br />in the Division s June 29 2017 letter, Cotter requests a hearing before the Board at its <br />December 2017 meeting (currently scheduled for December 13-14, 2017) pursuant to Colo. Rev. <br />Stat. § 34-32-103(6)(a)(III) and Hard Rock/Metal Mining Rule 1.13.5(1)(b).”(emphasis <br />added)(attached). <br />The MLRA and Board Rule citations referenced by Cotter confirm that Cotter has the <br />burden of demonstrating its entitlement to a second term of temporary cessation. Importantly, as <br />discussed below, the requirements for an operator seeking the Board to grant a second term of <br />temporary cessation are procedurally and substantively distinct from the standards that apply to a <br />request for a first term of temporary cessation. Moreover, the Board’s Order in 2013, that Cotter <br />so heavily relies upon this proceeding, imposed the burden on the party that requested the <br />hearing. <br />For a first term of temporary cessation, the MLRA bestows temporary cessation status on <br />an operator so long as the operator “files a notice thereof with the board stating the reasons for <br />nonproduction a plan for the resumption thereof, and the measures taken to comply with the <br />reclamation and other necessary activities established by the board to maintain the mine in a <br />nonproducing state.” C.R.S. § 34-32-103(6)(a)(II). This is the reason Objectors were found to <br />have the burden of proof in the first proceeding five years ago – because the Objectors asked for <br />the hearing and it would not have occurred had the Objectors not filed a request for the hearing. <br />However, for the second term of temporary cessation, no such automatic grant is allowed <br />based on the simple filing of a notice. Rather, the operator must “file a report requesting an <br />extension of the period of temporary cessation of production with the board stating the reasons
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.