My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-02-15_PERMIT FILE - M2017036 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2017036
>
2018-02-15_PERMIT FILE - M2017036 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2018 9:05:34 AM
Creation date
2/16/2018 8:00:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2017036
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/15/2018
Doc Name Note
Adequacy Review #3
Doc Name
Adequacy Review #3 Response
From
Telesto
To
DRMS
Email Name
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
287
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
To: Jared Ebert <br />Date: February 14, 2018 <br />Page 10 <br />Response 37a <br />Please see Section 7 of the revised groundwater report. Note that deepening of <br />neighbors' wells is a viable solution as most wells are shallow (less than 10 feet deep <br />with approximately 5 feet of saturated thickness). The majority use of the wells is for <br />domestic lawn and gardening at pumping rates less than 20 gpm. Well drawdown <br />required in this aquifer to achieve 20 gpm is less than 1 foot. Thus, deepening of wells is <br />a viable mitigation strategy, assuming that the wells are legally permitted. <br />Comment 37b <br />The following items will need to be addressed regarding the proposed monitoring and <br />mitigation plan included with the groundwater report submitted: <br />i. Section 7.0 states the groundwater model will be updated and verified as more <br />data is collected. Please commit to updating the model with all available <br />monitoring data annually and submitting the results, and monitoring data, with <br />the annual report. <br />ii. Section 7.1 states that groundwater depth/level data will be collected monthly for <br />1 year, dropping to quarterly thereafter until active operations are completed. <br />Given the concerns for impacts to surrounding structures/wells, and the <br />usefulness of the data for the groundwater model calibration/verification, please <br />commit to maintain the monthly groundwater level monitoring for the life of the <br />permit. <br />iii. Section 7.1.4 also states that, with well owner's permission, they will monitor <br />levels in the identified nearby private wells semi-annually. For the same reasons <br />listed above, this data should be collected quarterly if possible. For clarity, <br />please specify which of the neighbor's wells will be monitored. <br />iv. Section 7.1.6 states that LRM proposes a drawdown trigger level of 5 feet to <br />trigger additional monitoring and possible mitigation if required. This seems <br />reasonable. However, please clearly define the baseline elevations for each well <br />that will be used to determine what the drawdown level in that area is. These <br />baseline elevations should take into account the seasonal variations of the well <br />levels. <br />v. No trigger level for groundwater mounding was proposed in Section 7.1.6 of the <br />groundwater study, however sections 3.3 and 5.1 of the groundwater study <br />indicates that a trigger level of 2 feet above baseline would be appropriate. <br />Similar to the item above, please clearly define the baseline elevations for each <br />Response to DRMSAdequacy Review 3 comments T E L E S T O
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.