Laserfiche WebLink
Alluvial waters are of poor quality and may be unsuitable for use in <br />irrigation. Leachate from coal stockpiled at the Loadout could have <br />potentially infiltrated the alluvium and added dissolved chemical loads to the <br />Dry Creek alluvial aquifer; however, impacts to Dry Creek alluvial water <br />quality have been minimal due to the size of the operation and the <br />composition of the coal. Alluvial ground water monitoring was conducted <br />utilizing wells installed prior to 1993 by the previous operator, HG Coal <br />Company. Well HGDALI was completed in the alluvium up gradient of the <br />Loadout and well HGDAL2 was located down gradient of the Loadout. <br />Based on concerns by the Division that wells HGDALI and HGDAL2 may <br />have been completed in the Lewis shale rather than the Dry Creek alluvium, <br />two addition wells were constructed. In October of 1993, the HGDAL3 well <br />was constructed down gradient from the rail loop to assure that potential <br />ground water impacts from the Loadout could be assessed and in November <br />of 2005, while well HGDAL4 was completed up gradient from the Loadout. <br />HGT continues to monitor HGDAL3 and HGDAL4 in accordance with the <br />approved monitoring plan found in Tab 13 of the Permit Application. Wells <br />HGDALI and HGDAL2 were sealed in September of 2007 in accordance <br />with Rule 4.07.3(3). <br />The Lewis shale is an aquitard and should not be significantly affected by <br />any additional waters that might contribute to the site as a result of operations <br />at the Loadout. Water used at the site is drawn from the Yampa River <br />alluvium. It is conceivable that waters seeping from sediment ponds and <br />from the operations leach field may contribute additional water to Dry <br />Creek's alluvium, but is not expected to be significant. <br />Pursuant to Rule 2.07.6(2)(c), the assessment of the probable consequences <br />of the proposed mining operation and the assessment of the probable <br />cumulative impact of all anticipated mining in the area on the hydrologic <br />balance, as described in Rule 2.05.6(3), have been made. The proposed <br />operation has been found to be designed to prevent material damage to the <br />hydrologic balance outside the permit area. <br />IV. Topsoil <br />Information regarding soil resources and salvage may be found in Tab 9, Tab 17, Tab <br />19, Attachments 9-1, 9-2, 9-3, 9-4, and Exhibits 9-1 and 9-2 of the permit. <br />A. The Loadout and railroad spur were constructed from 1977 to 1979. These facilities <br />were previously permitted under Permit No. C-80-003. Topsoil was stripped from <br />the facilities site, railroad spur, and railroad loop, and stockpiled. All suitable A <br />horizon topsoil and some upper B horizon subsoil material was salvaged. <br />M <br />