Laserfiche WebLink
4. The Division finds that the affected area is, subject to valid rights existing as of August 3, <br />1977, not within: <br />a) An area designated unsuitable for surface coal mining operations (2.07.6(2)(d)(i)); <br />b) An area under study for designation as unsuitable for surface coal mining operations <br />(2.07.6(2)(d)(ii)); <br />c) The boundaries of the National Park System, the National Wildlife Refuge System, <br />the National System of Trails, the National Wilderness Preservation System, the Wild <br />and Scenic Rivers System including rivers under study for designation, and National <br />Recreation Areas (2.07.6(2)(d)(iii)(A)); <br />d) Three hundred feet of any public building, school, church, community or institutional <br />building, or public park (2.07.6(2)(d)(iii)(B)); <br />e) One hundred feet of a cemetery (2.07.6(2)(d)(iii)(C)); <br />f) The boundaries of any National Forest unless the required finding of compatibility <br />has been made by the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. <br />(2.07.6(2)(d)(iii)(D)); <br />g) One hundred feet of the outside right-of-way line of any public road except where <br />mine access or haul roads join such line, and excepting any roads for which the <br />necessary approvals have been received, notices published, public hearing <br />opportunities provided, and written findings made (2.07.6(2)(d)(iv)); <br />h) Three hundred feet of an occupied dwelling unless a written waiver from the owner <br />has been provided (2.07.6(2)(d)(v)). <br />5. On the basis of information submitted by Peabody Sage Creek Mining, LLC and a letter <br />of approval from the State Historic Preservation Office, dated July 30, 2009, the Division <br />finds that subject to valid existing rights as of August 3, 1977, the mining operation will <br />not adversely affect any publicly owned park or place listed on or eligible for listing in the <br />National Register of Historic Places as determined by the State Historic Preservation <br />Office (2.07.6(2)(e)(i)). The proposed renewal does not involve any new surface <br />disturbance, and a concurrence letter was received from History Colorado on 2/17/2015. <br />6. For this surface mining operation, private mineral estate has not been severed from private <br />surface estate; therefore, the documentation specified by Rule 2.03.6(2) is not required <br />(2.07.6(2)(f)). <br />7. On the basis of evidence submitted by the applicant and received from other state and <br />federal agencies as a result of the Section 34-33-114(3) compliance review required by the <br />12 <br />