My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-01-17_REVISION - M2009074
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2009074
>
2018-01-17_REVISION - M2009074
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 6:02:20 PM
Creation date
1/17/2018 12:35:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2009074
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/17/2018
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Environment, Inc.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
CN1
Email Name
ERR
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
GEOTECHNICAL STABILITY EXHIBIT(CONT) Page 2 <br /> the Permit Line and the Baily House is 159 feet from the dig line <br /> (Section N-S - 1/ to 1V Existing Slope) . When the mining face in <br /> this area reaches the floor, the toe of the mine face will be 165 <br /> feet from the closest point on the house The cross section shows <br /> In the past, Mr. Alan Sorenson reviewed Slope Stability <br /> Reports prepared for the mine in Colorado and he suggested that <br /> an appropriate friction angle could be found in Table 1 of a <br /> Federal Highway Administration paper Rock Slopes: Design, Excavation <br /> and Stabilization, Publication No. FR WA-TS-89-045, Table 1 - Typical Soil and <br /> Rock Properties and used when non-site-specific information was <br /> available of a gravel deposit . So for this analysis a 35' <br /> friction angle and a near vertical mining face of %: 1 is used for <br /> the pre reclamation calculations . For the reclamation calcula- <br /> tion a 3 : 1 slope was used (Section N-S - 3H to 1V Reclaimed <br /> Slope) . <br /> The material in the mine wall will be in-place sand and <br /> gravel and assumed to be cohesionless and having an assumed <br /> natural friction angle (0) of 350 (z1 . 43 : 1) . This is consistent <br /> with observations made along the north side of the permit area <br /> where the old mine face has remained undisturbed many <br /> Using the measured angles from the cross section <br /> ns, the safety factors for each slope was calculated using the <br /> 35o (0) as the base angle . The safety factors are shown in the <br /> following table using the formula FS = TanO =Tan6, where 6 is the <br /> slope angle from the toe of the created slope to the closest <br /> structure. I have also calculated the Factor of Safety for the <br /> �5: 1 and the 3 : 1 slopes . <br /> SLOPES EVALUATED CALCULATED FACTOR OF SAFETY <br /> SLOPE ANGLE FOR NATURAL SLOPE <br /> O ANGLE 0=35° <br /> PROPOSED MINING 63.40 0.35 <br /> SLOPE (Y2:1) <br /> SLOPE FROM MINING 4.200) 9.54 <br /> TOE TO HOUSE <br /> FINAL SLOPE 3H TO 1V <br /> SLOPE FROM TOE TO 3.60 11.13 <br /> OUSE <br /> 4.2° angle is calculated from 12 feet slope height and 165 feet horizontal <br /> (2) from the toe of mine face to the Baily House <br /> 3.6° angle is calculated from 12 feet slope height and 190 feet horizontal <br /> from the toe of reclaimed slope to the Baily House <br /> The safety factor for the Baily house 9 . 54 when the mining <br /> face is mined near vertical and 11 . 13 when the final slope is <br /> constructed. Both numbers exceed the 1 . 5 normally used. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.