My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-01-16_PERMIT FILE - M2017036 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2017036
>
2018-01-16_PERMIT FILE - M2017036 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2021 5:29:41 AM
Creation date
1/17/2018 12:34:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2017036
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/16/2018
Doc Name
Groundwater Study
From
Loveland Ready-Mix Concrete
To
DRMS
Email Name
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
165
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Second Submittal <br /> 5.3.4 Water Quality <br /> One of the concerns voiced by neighbors during the neighborhood meeting was the <br /> potential for water quality impacts from the Site. No constituents of concern are produced <br /> on site that could significantly impact water quality. Constituents of concern contained in <br /> fuel, cement, and admixtures are fully contained and tracked. Primary containment is <br /> backed up by secondary containment (e.g.,buildings, storm water containment, secondary <br /> containers/liners). Thus, there is no exposure of waters to chemicals. Additionally, all <br /> surface and storm water will be contained on site. Thus, there can be no off-site impacts <br /> to surface water. Similarly, the direction of groundwater flow during all phases of mining <br /> is towards the dewatering sump. iThus, there can be no off-site migration of groundwater <br /> 4. should the unlikely event of a release occur. <br /> 5.4 Discussion <br /> 5.4.1 Model Stability <br /> The model converged to,a soli ion during every iteration for the calibration and predictive <br /> scenarios, meeting the minimum error criteria in the heads of 0.001 foot. No other <br /> significant errors were reported in the model runs. These statistics provide confidence that <br /> the model runs were numerically accurate and that the results are numerically sound. <br /> 5.4.2 Predictive Results <br /> Based on the good correlation and numerical stability of the model, confidence can be <br /> placed in the predictive results. The predictions provide a good indicator of areas that will <br /> require special attention as dewatering progresses and gives the opportunity for LRM and <br /> neighbors to be pro-active. <br /> 6.0 MITIGATION STRATEGIES <br /> Prior to implementing any mitigation strategies for neighboring wells that could potentially <br /> be impacted, LRM will discuss the options with neighbors and evaluate suitability of the <br /> three mitigation strategies described in Section 5.3.1. To aid in the evaluation, the <br /> reinjection strategy is simulated for the Plantorium and Morgan Timber wells. <br /> Loveland Ready-Mix Concrete 21 Telesto Solutions,Inc. <br /> 20180112_gmwalwale tuay_2ndsubnunalaocx Jan uary2018 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.