My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-12-14_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981010
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2017-12-14_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2019 2:09:05 PM
Creation date
1/4/2018 10:12:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
12/14/2017
Doc Name Note
For PR8
Doc Name
Proposed Decision and Findings of Compliance
From
DRMS
To
Trapper Mining, Inc.
Type & Sequence
PR8
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Email Name
RAR
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
can be found in Section 4.8.5.1 a of the permit application, Vol. IV (4.05.13(2)). <br />The Division reviewed the surface and ground water monitoring plans as part of <br />the permit revision PR8 review process. These monitoring plans are adequate to <br />monitor for the development of impacts, if any should develop. Well GP -09 has <br />been designated the groundwater point of compliance for the Third White <br />Sandstone aquifer, and the Coy well is the point of compliance for the Flume <br />Gulch alluvium. <br />No new or revised water monitoring is being proposed under PR 8 other than <br />monitoring of the outfalls of the new Deacon and Jeffway ponds as per Water <br />Quality Control Division Requirements. <br />E. Probable Hydrologic Consequences <br />The model for leachate formation and migration at the Trapper Mine is based on <br />a study conducted by the U.S. Geological Survey at the Seneca II Mine in Routt <br />County, approximately 14 miles east of the Trapper Mine (U.S. Geological <br />Survey Water Resources Investigations Report 92-4187). The model is described <br />in the probable hydrologic consequences of the permit application (Section 4.8). <br />No drawdowns have been detected in aquifer wells within one mile from the <br />permit boundary. Observed draw -downs have been temporary and are limited to <br />the immediate vicinity of the pits. The operator expects such limited draw -downs <br />to continue with future mining. <br />The proposed mining operation will have little if any effects on the post -mining <br />recharge capacity. The applicant's studies concluded that the recharge capacity of <br />the reclaimed spoils will actually be slightly higher than the pre -mine condition. <br />The mine activities should not impact any regional aquifers except the Third <br />White Sandstone. Mined strata dip far beneath the Yampa River alluvial aquifer <br />and communication between these strata and the alluvial aquifer is negligible. <br />Permit section 4.8.2.2 discusses potential drawdown impacts to adjacent wells. A <br />groundwater monitoring program is discussed in section 4.8.3.2 of the permit. <br />Point of compliance wells are in place. <br />Surface Water Impacts <br />The most noticeable change in surface water quality resulting from mining <br />activities constitutes increased levels of total dissolved solids (TDS). TMI expects <br />higher TDS in some surface water runoff for a few years after reclamation in <br />an area. The higher TDS levels will occur periodically when the contribution <br />from precipitation and snowmelt is at a minimum (base flow conditions). <br />Conductivity, TDS and major constituents tend to increase as the ground water <br />contribution comprises a larger portion of flow. For a detailed analysis of surface <br />water impacts, the 2016 Annual Hydrology Report, Section 2.5 of the permit <br />presents the most current information. <br />18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.