My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-12-29_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1982121
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Minerals
>
M1982121
>
2010-12-29_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1982121
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/4/2020 4:18:25 AM
Creation date
1/2/2018 11:46:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1982121
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
12/29/2010
Doc Name Note
Documents for Acerage Resilution Issue
Doc Name
Quarry Survey and boundary
From
Rocky Mountain Resources
To
DRMS
Email Name
ACY
GRM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ROCKY MOUNTAIN <br /> R E S 0 U R C E S <br /> RMR proposes the following solution to the boundary issue. <br /> 1. Recreate the survey points for the approved AM-2 boundary using the perimeter shown in <br /> green in Figure 1 and in RE.Mid-Continent LST, Permit No. M-1982-121,Approved Acreage and <br /> Map Boundaries(pg. 3 and pg. 5 in green). <br /> 2. Adjust the recorded area of the AM-2 boundary to approximately 38 acres to match the area <br /> shown in the AM-2 boundary drawings mentioned in bullet point number 1. <br /> 3. Survey and install visible boundary markers, in the field,for AM-2 boundary. <br /> RMR could quickly affect the above-mentioned items through the CO DRMS if they are deemed <br /> acceptable. <br /> The surveyed images and topographical maps provided to RMR by SGM Engineering are included below. <br /> RMR has placed boundary markers on the proposed revision boundary in the field. Pictures of the <br /> boundary markers are included below. RMR realizes this boundary is not the currently approved AM-2 <br /> boundary, and would change the markers to match the approved AM-2 boundary once there is <br /> agreement on the location of the boundary between CO DRMS and RMR. RMR does not have a need to <br /> extend the boundary to the proposed revision boundary of 43 acres.We wish to resolve the boundary <br /> issue in the easiest way possible, and are open to ideas from the CO DRMS if they have more history or <br /> information available to reference. <br /> Please feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> F),/ 1 . �J <br /> Robert T.Wagner <br /> VP, Mining Operations <br /> Rocky Mountain Resources <br /> 720-660-3279 <br /> rwagner@rmrholdings.com <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.