My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-12-22_PERMIT FILE - M2017049 (31)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2017049
>
2017-12-22_PERMIT FILE - M2017049 (31)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2021 4:19:56 AM
Creation date
12/22/2017 2:15:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2017049
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/22/2017
Doc Name
Objection
From
Charlton Brice
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Objection Received
Email Name
AME
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
December 19, 2017 <br /> Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety �' .� �i►'� <br /> 1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 _ <br /> Denver, CO 80203 � '" vr,%ti Ir <br /> RE: Permit No. M2017049 <br /> Ms. Amy Eschberger; <br /> I am writing to object to the latest Transit Mix Application to the CDRMS, application number <br /> M2017-049 because, quite simply, their application fails to protect our critical water resources, <br /> significant wildlife habitat and the easement rights of several property owners along Little Turkey <br /> Creek Road. As such, I am an aggrieved party and an interested person per CRS 24-4-102. (3.5) <br /> (6.2)(11) seeking relief per CRS 24-4-102. (14). <br /> 1 attended the previous MLRB Hearing for Transit Mix's original application and this effort to <br /> rework their original presentation does not address the dynamics of the entire fracture system <br /> that controls the subsurface water moving through the Little Turkey Creek Canyon structure, nor <br /> does it adequately protect the hydrologic balance for down stream and adjacent users. The <br /> subsurface impact of an operation directly astride this area is not adequately researched nor is <br /> the risk they are willing to take to all our affected water resources justifiable. Transit Mix bears no <br /> risk to their own water resources, but are willing to cause all the residents to do so in order to <br /> expand their business into our existing communities. <br /> By keeping all but their own hired researchers off the Turkey Creek Ranch, they can argue that <br /> wildlife will cope and adjust to this intrusive operation for 55 years plus, but it is specious to allow <br /> the present valuable riparian corridor to be altered permanently for a commodity (granite gravel) <br /> that is neither scarce nor unique to the Colorado Front range, while surface watered canyons are <br /> demonstrably the exception. Little Turkey Creek Canyon is"exceptional"to many species of <br /> plants and wildlife precisely and simply because it is not a dry corridor. <br /> Finally, as pointed out in the findings of the MLRB on their first application, Transit Mix has not <br /> taken any steps to seek the required Declaratory Judgment concerning the Little Turkey Creek <br /> Easement issue,which I find to be in contempt of the board's findings. <br /> While they have the right under the statutes to reapply, and the funds to drag this out, Transit Mix <br /> has not changed their fundamentally flawed premise that we need or want a quarry injected into <br /> the wrong location for many basic reasons. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Charlton L. Brice <br /> 11735 Calle Corvo <br /> Colorado Springs, CO 80926 <br /> (719)527-0433 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.