Laserfiche WebLink
Administrative agency decisions are presumptively valid. Colo. Div. of Ins. <br /> v. Auto-Owner's Ins. Co., 219 P.3d 371, 376 (Colo. App. 2009). All reasonable <br /> doubts as to the correctness of administrative orders must be resolved in favor of <br /> the agency. City and County of Denver v. Bd. Of Adjustment, 55 P.3d 252, 254 <br /> (Colo. App. 2002). The party challenging an administrative agency's action bears <br /> the burden of overcoming the presumption that the agency's acts were proper. Id. <br /> A court must defer to the views of administrative agencies that are <br /> authorized to administer and enforce particular laws. Coffman v. Colorado <br /> Common Cause, 102 P.3d 999, 1005 (Colo. 2004). While the court determines <br /> questions of law, agency construction of a statute should be given appropriate <br /> deference. Id. <br /> Findings of evidentiary fact may not be set aside on review unless they are <br /> contrary to the weight of the evidence. Colo. State Bd. of Nursing v. Lang, 842 <br /> P.2d 1383, 1387 (Colo. App. 1992). The Board determines the weight and <br /> credibility of the evidence. Chostner v. Colo. Water Quality Control Comm'n, 327 <br /> P.3d 290, 297 (Colo. App. 2013). A reviewing court may not reweigh evidence or <br /> substitute its own judgment for that of an agency. Microsemi Corp. of Colo. v. <br /> Broomfield County Bd. of Equalization, 200 P.3d 1123, 1125 (Colo. App. 2008). <br /> Agency findings may be express or implied from a reading of the entire <br /> record. Colorado Office of Consumer Counsel v. Publ. Utilities Comm'n, 786 P.2d <br /> 10 <br />