My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-12-12_REVISION - M1984094
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1984094
>
2017-12-12_REVISION - M1984094
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 6:25:35 PM
Creation date
12/13/2017 8:14:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1984094
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/12/2017
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Greg Lewicki And Associates, PLLC
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR6
Email Name
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
To DRMS Den Page 2 of 3 2017-12-12 18.22:46 (GMT) 13032008630 From Greg Lewcki <br />G reg Lewicki And .Associates, PLIX <br />3375 NW. P:t+vena 0rde Phtiui�: (7210 842-5321 Fax (303),346-6934 <br />December 12, 2017 <br />Michael Cunningham <br />Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety <br />1313 Sherman St, Rm 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Gloria Z Pit NI -1984-094, Technical Revision 06 Adequacy Response l <br />Mr. Cututingham <br />In response to your adequacy questions dates November 22, 2017, the following information is <br />provided to address you questions and comments. <br />1. The Applicant is proposing to change the final grade of the reclaimed slopes from 5H: IV to <br />3H: IV. Please provide a technical justification or otherwise explain how changing the final <br />Waimed grade to 3H:1 V will support the post -mining land use of rangeland. <br />The ret=iscd reclatumed slope Hill facililate reclamation tv the approt'rd lc►nd use of rangeriund 3H:1I' <br />mezrimum slopes are prq/erred by the landowne r to support future Potential derclopment of the <br />property, including a pond or other water feature, <br />2. The Operator has provided a financial warranty calculation which accounts for refuse which has <br />been removed from the site. In order for the Dig -~,,ton to give the Operator credit for refuse and <br />equipment which has been removed. a detailed accounting of the items which were removed <br />must be provided to the Division. Please reference the Division's financial warranty calculation <br />for a detailed inventors of the items which were bonded for removal. <br />The applicant accepts what- ver bond calculation, for r(fin x rernowl that the Djo.uon defermines 11 <br />ne cessary <br />3. The Operator's financial warranty calculation estimates the cost for seed bed preparation, <br />seeding. and mulching to be 523,400.00. The Division's estimated cost for the same <br />reclamation tasks is $63,077.00. '1'Itis amount was based on the approved Reclamation flan <br />and the total area affected by the mining operation. The Operator has not provided a bw-is for <br />a reduction in the amount of financial warranty required for these reclamation tasks. The <br />Operator shall clarify if any component of these reclamation tasks are being changed through <br />'technical Revision No_ 6. If no changes are being proposed, then the Division's estimate for <br />these tasks will be used in the revised financial warranty calculation. <br />Paril-'.s oulgruss is rema+veadfrom the: seed mix due to hmite:d treed at-ailuhth{►° for lite operaror. <br />Gloria Z Pit I X.2-1-1 111.li• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.