Laserfiche WebLink
PROJECT DESCRIPTION <br /> 1. Reclamation Costs,p. 7-4. The last sentence in paragraph 7.2 states "Completed reclamation <br /> will be deducted from the amount included in previous years for that particular area." Please <br /> be aware and acknowledge CC&V must submit a revision request in the form of either a <br /> partial acreage reduction or surety reduction to the Division in order for any change in <br /> reclamation liability to be approved, as the Division is required by C.R.S.34-32- 117(4)(c) <br /> and Rule 4.14(2)to verify reclamation is completed as stated in the approved permit. <br /> RESPONSE: CC&V acknowledges that an acreage reduction request must be submitted to <br /> reduce reclamation liability to verify reclamation is complete as stated in the permit. <br /> 6.4 SPECIFIC EXHIBIT REQUIREMENTS— 112d DESIGNATED MINING OPERATIONS <br /> 6.4.1 EXHIBIT A—Legal Description <br /> 2. Mine Entrance Location. Pursuant to Rule 6.4.1(2) the mine entrance location must be <br /> included in Exhibit A. The coordinates for the entrance location should be identical to those <br /> provided in the Application Form, Item 10. Most Applicants present the mine entrance <br /> location at the beginning of Exhibit A, before describing the affected area. Please resubmit <br /> Exhibit A with the mine entrance location included. <br /> RESPONSE: The mine entrance location has been added to Exhibit A. See Attachment 1. <br /> Also, when verging the coordinates for the main entrance we noted that the Application <br /> Form had coordinates for the entrance located at the Carlton Security gate (near the ADR), <br /> which at one time did serve as the main entrance to the mine. The main entrance was changed <br /> to the Iron Clad Security gate. To reflect this change, the application form has been updated <br /> to include the coordinates of the Iron Clad Security gate and a replacement page 2 for the <br /> application also is included in Attachment 1. <br /> 3. Carlton Tunnel, p. A-3. When compared to the legal description presented in AM-11 and <br /> agroved by the Division, no portions of Section 16 (Township 16 South, Range 70 West, <br /> 6 Fii Principle Meridian) were included. The AM-12 description does not mention any <br /> boundary adjustments to the Carlton Tunnel area. This particular Section 16 is managed by <br /> the State Land Board(SLB)and may have additional permit implications.The Division noted <br /> (see Exhibit C, Drawing C-1 Comments 4a, 7, and 10 below) there is a sliver of Section 16 <br /> in the inset portion of Drawings C-1 and C-1 a that appears to be inside the permit boundary. <br /> However, Drawing C-2a clearly shows the permit boundary outside of Section 16. Please <br /> confirm whether or not the Carlton Tunnel portion of the permit boundary includes any of <br /> Section 16, and resubmit Exhibits A, C, and F as appropriate. <br /> RESPONSE:The Division is correct in that there was no boundary adjustment to the Carlton <br /> Page 2 of 7 <br />