My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-10-23_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1980007
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
2017-10-23_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1980007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2017 7:12:12 AM
Creation date
10/24/2017 6:56:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
10/23/2017
Doc Name
Compliant and Request for Inspection Over Failure of West Elk
From
Wild Earth Gurdians
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
MPB
JRS
LDS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
of this requirement, the source submitted an APEN for the generator for the main office building <br />server on February 15, 2013. <br />-Tioga Heater for ROM Processing Plant: It was noted during the inspection that there was a <br />diesel fired Tioga heater located near the ROM processing plant. The unit provides space <br />heating for the structures within the ROM processing area during winter months. The source <br />conservatively estimated in their January 11, 2013 correspondence that the Tioga Heater <br />consumes approximately 45,000 gallons of diesel fuel per year. This is based on a rate of 300 <br />gallons per day from November through March. In the response received February 14, 2013, <br />MCC provided emissions calculations (AP -42, Table 1.3-1, Boilers <100 MMBtu/hr, distillate oil) <br />which verified that at this consumption level, the unit is operating below APEN reporting <br />thresholds. Specifically, the unit's NOx emissions (the highest criteria pollutant emissions from <br />this unit), are only 0.45 tpy at a throughput of 45,000 gallons/yr. No APEN is required, and no <br />further action is required for this unit by the source. <br />-Used Oil Heater for Maintenance Shop: While reviewing the source's 2011 EPA Greenhouse <br />Gas Report, it was noted that the facility operates a used oil heater for their maintenance shop. <br />MCC was requested to provide fuel throughput for this heater in a' 111 Request Letter' dated <br />December 13, 2012 (extension granted on December 30, 2012). In their January 11, 2013 <br />response, MCC stated that they burn approximately 250 gallons of used oil in the heater per year. <br />This amount of fuel combustion would result in emissions far below the APEN reporting <br />thresholds. No APEN is required for this Point, and no further action is required by the source. <br />VOC Emissions Discussion: <br />The Division has recently become aware that certain coal mine operations may be significant <br />sources of uncontrolled VOC emissions which have been previously unreported. Almost all of the <br />hydrocarbon gas released during mining is methane (>98%), with small amounts of ethane also <br />present. Both methane and ethane are exempt from classification as VOCs for APEN/permitting <br />purposes (Ref: AQCC Regulation 3, Part A, § II.D.1.00). However, due to the extremely large <br />volume of gas released from coal mining operations, even a small percentage of non- <br />methane/ethane hydrocarbons (NMEHC = VOC) present in the gas stream can result in <br />significant VOC emissions. For example, MCC reported a total of 51,290 US tons (46,529.83 <br />metric tons) of methane released during 2011. Even at extremely low concentrations compared <br />to methane, VOC emissions above APEN and Permitting thresholds are extremely likely at such <br />high levels of methane release. <br />In 2009, Mountain Coal Company LLC — West Elk Mine conducted an extended gas analysis on <br />two of their E Seam MDWs as part of a draft environmental impact statement (see attached). <br />The samples were meant to be representative of emissions from a well at the beginning of its <br />'lifecycle' (i.e. high producing with 60.7% methane concentration) and a well at the end its <br />lifecycle (i.e. low producing with only 34.5% methane concentration). Using the values in these <br />extended gas analysis, the inspector calculated a ratio percentage of NMEHC:CH4 concentration <br />(CH4 = Methane). The high producing well had a NMEHC:CH4 ratio of 0.768% and the low <br />producing well had a ratio of 0.791 %. As each mine is required to track and record methane <br />emissions from all mine activities due to the greenhouse gas reporting rule, this value can thus be <br />multiplied by the total amount of methane reported in order to give an estimate of the NMEHC <br />emissions from each facility. This method was developed because of the limited data available <br />as to the total air flow from the facilities, and was also used to address variation in release <br />concentrations of methane from various points (variation which is accounted for in GHG methane <br />reporting records, which are available). Although these gas analyses were not conducted at all <br />points of the mine, they appear consistent with available literature which suggests that coal mine <br />gas includes a very small percentage of NMEHC. Furthermore, although methane gas <br />concentrations vary during gob drainage, it is reasonable to suggest that the extended gas <br />analysis results concerning overall NMEHC content in the gas samples remains relatively stable. <br />2012 Air Pollution Inspection <br />0510015-INSP-2012. docx Page 7 of 30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.