Laserfiche WebLink
t4wftt fire <br />11161216+i;i August 31, 2016 <br />Table 1. Sediment Pond Spillway Analysis <br />Structure Peak <br />Spillway <br />Peak Water Surface <br />Top of Pond <br />Freeboard <br />Discharge (cfs) <br />Elevation <br />Elevation <br />Elevation <br />(ft) <br />(ft amsl) <br />(ft amsl) <br />(ft amsl) <br />Dugout Pond 3.97 <br />4779.00 <br />4779.06 <br />4780.00 <br />0.94 <br />Sediment 13.39 <br />4773.50 <br />4774.03 <br />4775.00 <br />0.97 <br />Pond 2 <br />Ditch Analysis <br />A separate SEDCAD analysis of the permanent ditches that convey stormwater to Sediment Pond 2 was <br />conducted to verify the ditches have sufficient capacity to handle a 10 -year, 24-hour storm. The <br />majority of the Sediment Pond 2 watershed enters the pond in the northwest corner via the Permanent <br />West Perimeter Ditch (Exhibit 2). The Permanent East Perimeter Ditch has a relatively small watershed <br />that flows into the northeast corner of Sediment Pond 2. Both ditches were modeled separately. The <br />maximum modeled discharge for the Permanent West Perimeter Ditch is 2.36 cfs, while the Permanent <br />East Perimeter Ditch has a modeled peak discharge of 0.02 cfs. Both ditches were modeled as vegetated <br />v -shaped channels with 2.5:1 sideslopes. The modeled depth of flow for both channels is less than 1.0 -ft <br />deep. The ditch design in the permit is 3 -feet deep. Additionally, the ditch was designed to handle 95 <br />cfs. The ditch design geometry and design flow are referenced from the December 1, 1994 letter from <br />David Berry to Shawn Smith. Since the new hydrologic analysis utilizing current climate information <br />produces a lower discharge than the original ditch design, and since the modeled depth of flow has well <br />over 0.3 ft of freeboard compared with the ditch design depth, the previously designed permanent <br />perimeter ditches have adequate capacity. <br />Summary <br />The Dugout Pond and Sediment Pond 2 were analyzed using current climate data from NOAA Atlas 14 to <br />verify they are sufficiently sized to handle the 25 -year, 24-hour storm. Both ponds have sufficient <br />capacity to contain the 25 -year, 24-hour storm. Furthermore, if the ponds happen to be full (of water or <br />sediment) the spillway configuration has sufficient capacity to safely pass the 25 -year, 24-hour storm. <br />Additionally, the two permanent ditches were analyzed to verify they are sufficiently sized to handle the <br />10 -year, 24-hour storm based on current climate data. The modeled flow depth and discharge are <br />significantly lower than the original design values, therefore the existing ditch designs have adequate <br />capacity. SEDCAD modeling is available in Appendix A of this report. This hydrological analysis assumes <br />the entire watershed has positive drainage to Sediment Pond 2. However, based on aerial photography <br />there are several roads and numerous depressions present outside of the CEC site, but within the <br />watershed boundary that likely interrupt drainage and provide water storage, effectively reducing the <br />stormwater runoff that actually drains to Sediment Pond 2. Therefore, this hydrological analysis is <br />conservative in nature, and consistent with anecdotal evidence that Sediment Pond 2 has never <br />discharged, and that there is rarely evidence of flow in the drainage ditches. <br />Keenesburg Mine Hydrologic Analysis 2 of 2 <br />