Laserfiche WebLink
Roadside Mine <br />#00489-0004 Huddlestan-Beefy <br />08/25/16 <br />The recent survey also identifies a horizontal anomaly north of the air shaft. However, the <br />anomaly does not appear to connect to the air shaft. In addition, no surface sinkhole expression <br />was observed in this area. <br />Although the survey identified two horizontal anomalies, the data did not identify any horizontal <br />anomaly extending from the rock pile feature discussed in the report. As indicated in the <br />referenced Fugro report, water was dumped into this feature and as a result, HBET would have <br />anticipated that any horizontal anomaly extending from this location would be identified during <br />the survey. <br />Recommendations <br />As outlined in the referenced May 9, 2016 report, the recommended mitigation measures <br />included excavation / backfilling of the sinkhole / shaft and compaction grouting. Based upon <br />the results of the recent geophysical survey, both alternatives are still appropriate. The survey <br />indicated that the connection between the horizontal anomaly and air shaft occurs at a depth of <br />approximately 5 in (-16.5 ft). This is within the reach of a large excavator. However, in order <br />to adequately close the pathways using this method, significant ground disturbance would be <br />required. As a result, it may be preferable to utilize compaction grouting to seal off the shaft / <br />horizontal pathway. Based upon the geophysical survey results, the grout hole depth of 25 feet <br />recommended in the referenced report is still believed to be valid. <br />As mentioned previously, the geophysical survey identified a second horizontal anomaly north of <br />the air shaft. Although the data did not show a connection between this horizontal anomaly and <br />vertical anomaly (air shaft), HBET recommends that trenches be excavated perpendicular to this <br />horizontal anomaly in an effort to expose the feature creating this anomaly and further evaluate <br />any potential impacts on the mine workings and/or need for mitigation. <br />General <br />The conclusions and recommendations above <br />available information, and upon our experience. <br />only for the subject project. <br />are based upon our observations at the site, <br />The conclusions and recommendations are valid <br />We are pleased to be of service to your project. Please contact us if you have any questions or <br />comments regarding the contents of this report. <br />Respectfully Submitted: <br />Huddleston -Berry Engineering and Testing, LLC <br />Michael A. Berry, P.E. <br />Vice President of Engineering <br />X:\2008 ALL PROJECTS\00489 - JE Stover Associates Inc\00489-0004 Roadside Mine\200 - Geo\00489-0004 LR082516.doc <br />N <br />TR -69 A14-15-2 09/16 <br />