Laserfiche WebLink
Records Custodian <br /> Page 2 <br /> private one. Daniels v. City of Commerce City, 988 P.2d 648 (Colo. App. 1999). Furthermore, a <br /> person need not show a special interest in order to be permitted access to particular public <br /> records. Denver Publ'g Co. v. Dreyfus, 184 Colo. 288, 520 P.2d 104 (1974). <br /> An official cannot deny access in the absence of specific statutory provision. In the <br /> absence of a specific statute permitting the withholding of information, a public official has no <br /> authority to deny any person access to public records. Denver Publ'g Co. v. Dreyfus, 184 Colo. <br /> 288, 520 P.2d 104 (1974); Denver Post Corp. v. Univ. of Colo., 739 P.2d 874 (Colo. App. 1987). <br /> The Colorado Open Records Act covers "all writings made, maintained or kept by the <br /> state, any agency, institution or political subdivision of the state." Colo. Rev. Stat. § 24-72- <br /> 202(6). <br /> The Open Records Act"writings" means and includes all books, papers, maps, <br /> photographs, cards, tapes, recordings, or other documentary materials, regardless of physical <br /> form or characteristics. <br /> "Writings" includes digitally stored data, including without limitation electronic mail <br /> messages, but does not include computer software. Colo. Rev. Stat §24-72-202(7). The presence <br /> of exempt information does not prevent inspection. Because the Open Records Act does not <br /> expressly exempt from inspection records that contain both exempt and nonexempt information, <br /> it does not prohibit inspection of public information in a record otherwise subject to inspection <br /> merely because the record also contains exempt information. However, the custodian of the <br /> record does not have a duty to delete exempt materials from an otherwise disclosable record. See <br /> Sargent School Dist. No. RE-33J v. Western Services Inc.. 751 P.2d 56, 61 (Colo. 1988); Office <br /> of State Court Administrator v. Background Info. Sys., 994 P.2d 420 (Colo. 1999) (digital <br /> records). <br /> If the records are not in your custody or control, please notify me forthwith and state in <br /> detail to the best of your knowledge the reason for the absence of the records, their location, and <br /> what person or persons has custody or control of the records, as required by Colo. Rev. Stat. § <br /> 24-72-203(2). <br /> Colo. Rev. Stat. § 24-72-203(3) requires you to let me know within three (3) working <br /> days when the requested records will be available for inspection. Please feel free to arrange a <br /> mutually convenient time to inspect these records or to have the documents copied and produced. <br /> If the documents are stored electronically, I request you make efforts to avoid copying <br /> time and charges and provide the documents in electronic format, e.g., copied to a compact disk <br /> or SD card. <br /> Only "nominal" fees may be charged for search and retrieval. Black v. Southwestern <br /> Water Conservation Dist., 74 P.3d 462 (Colo. App. 2003). <br /> If you deny access to any of the above public records, please provide forthwith a written <br />