Laserfiche WebLink
RULE 2 PERMITS <br />crosses from the Collom Pit to the Gossard loadout, Wilson Creek is at least 20 feet deep. The banks <br />show some undercutting and blocks of valley fill material coming off the sides. The vegetation on the <br />land on both sides of the creek in this area is predominantly upland vegetation. The vegetation is old <br />growth due to the size of the brush in this area. The deep valley of the creek and vegetation continues <br />along the length of Wilson Creek to the north of the loadout and for several miles north of the loadout. <br />Groundwater is this area is at least 20 feet below ground surface (bgs) in the shallow monitoring wells, <br />Gossard Well and MW -95-02. The Gossard Well is located northeast of the Gossard Loadout in the field <br />and MW -95-02 is located on the east bank of Wilson Creek, southwest of the loadout. The historical <br />average depth to water at the Gossard Well is approximately 21 feet (2009 Annual Reclamation Report). <br />Tetra Tech (2005) concluded that such depths to groundwater are too great to allow for agriculturally <br />significant subirrigation. MW -95-02 had a water level of 25.1 feet bgs in November 2016. (Further <br />information on groundwater occurrence is provided in Section 2.04.7). <br />In September of 2015, four geotechnical holes were drilled on both sides of Wilson Creek where the <br />crossing for the haul road leading from the Collom pit to the loadout is to be located. Groundwater was <br />detected in these geotechnical test hole at approximately 25 feet bgs. There are no visible seeps on the <br />sidewalls of the valley in the crossing area and both upstream and downstream of the crossing area. This <br />new data provides additional information to the conclusion that groundwater in the area is too deep for <br />any subirrigation. <br />The near surface valley fill materials in the area of the Collom haul road crossing over Wilson Creek were <br />found to be predominantly clay, based on the four geotechnical test holes. The clays do contain minor <br />amounts of gravel, sand and silt and were gray to dark brown in color. The thickness of the clays are at <br />least 10 feet thick and are stiff to hard. The materials present do not appear to meet the definition of <br />alluvial material for alluvial valley floors. <br />No evidence of flood irrigation was found for the fields surrounding the Gossard loadout. However, some <br />limited flood irrigation was conducted in the floodplain of Wilson Creek, north of and outside the permit <br />boundary (north of County Road 17). The ditch constructed for this irrigation is now heavily overgrown <br />with upland vegetation. The gate for this water diversion sets several feet above the Wilson Creek <br />channel and cannot be reached by current water flow from Wilson Creek. The area of concern <br />surrounding the Gossard Loadout facility was bypassed for flood irrigation historically in order to apply <br />irrigation water downstream to lands outside the current permit boundary. <br />Irrigation diversion points, irrigation ditches, and topography are shown on Map IOB. These areas are <br />well outside the subject drainages of Collom Gulch, Little Collom Gulch, and Jubb Creek. <br />Thus, the same conclusions as those previously presented for the creeks in the Collom syncline area may <br />be reached for the area of disturbance for construction of the Collom Haul Road in the vicinity of the <br />Gossard Loadout facility (Map 25E Sheet 5 of 10): <br />• Alluvial materials are present in the valley bottom of the Gossard Loadout complex, and the <br />lower reaches of the Lower Wilson Creek drainage, but the materials are intermixed with <br />significant fractions of colluvium and sheetwash from adjacent slopes and the mass wasting event <br />experienced in 1983-1984. <br />• Based on an average depth to groundwater of at least 20 feet, coupled with data from monitoring <br />wells and geotechnical test holes in the Wilson Creek area drilled in 2015,subirrigation within <br />this valley bottom is very limited in extent (outside and north of the permit area) or non-existent. <br />Active erosion in the stream channels is causing further incision and reduced flood frequency, <br />reducing the ability of this valley bottom to support any agricultural use other than rangeland or <br />Collom — Rule 2, Page 131 Revision Date: 1/6/17 <br />Revision No.: TR -109 <br />