My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-03-23_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2017-03-23_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2017 8:21:59 AM
Creation date
8/18/2017 10:18:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/23/2017
Doc Name
Permits
Section_Exhibit Name
Volume 15 Rule 2
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RULE 2 PERMITS <br />then a hogback formed by the uplift of the Iles formation is present. Proceeding north, the open area of <br />the Axial Basin is then encountered. <br />All drainages in the Collom Mine Expansion area form on the southern portion of the Collom <br />syncline/Danforth Hills. These drainages all flow northward toward and cross the Iles formation and then <br />flow into the Axial Basin. The drainages tend to be narrow, confined drainages until the drainages exit to <br />the Axial Basin. <br />A VF Specific Study-Collom Mine Area <br />In 2005, Tetra Tech, doing business as Maxim Technologies, conducted a preliminary field investigation <br />and technical evaluation of the Collom permit expansion area located in the Collom syncline area to <br />determine the presence of alluvial valley floors. The drainages examined include Collom Gulch, Little <br />Collom Gulch, and Jubb Creek (including the West Fork of Jubb Creek). The investigation was <br />conducted in accordance with Section 2.06.8 of the Regulations of the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation <br />Board for Coal Mining and OSMRE Technical Guideline. The results of the investigation concluded that <br />no alluvial valley floors exist in the areas to be mined. The findings were submitted to CDRMS on <br />September 23, 2005 in a letter, a copy of which is included in Volume 18, Exhibit 7, Item 24. These <br />findings are also discussed further in appropriate sections below. <br />The mined area is located within Little Collom Gulch, and the Collom Pit and temporary spoil pil will <br />occupy much of the Little Collom Gulch valley bottom during the mining operation. Portions of the <br />Collom Pit will lie within the adjacent watersheds of Collom Gulch and the West Fork of Jubb Creek, but <br />will not encroach on the valley bottoms (Map 23B). Groundwater in the general area occurs in valley fill <br />material associated with the stream valleys and in the permeable and semi -permeable bedrock strata <br />(CDM, 1985a). As discussed in Section 2.04.7, the existence of groundwater in the permit expansion area <br />is limited to perched systems that primarily discharge small amounts of water in the canyon walls near the <br />mine on a seasonal basis, and in some of the unconsolidated valley fill. Little Collom Gulch is <br />ephemeral, and did not produce any measurable flow during the baseline hydrologic monitoring efforts <br />described in Section 2.04.7. Very little groundwater is found in the current active mine; and, based on <br />existing geological and hydrological evidence, the area to be mined provides no or only minor amounts of <br />recharge to local surface water features. <br />Geomorphic Characteristics <br />Tetra Tech's 2005 investigation included mapping unconsolidated valley deposits in the Collom permit <br />expansion area, using published and unpublished geologic maps and ground reconnaissance. The results <br />are shown in Figure 1 of Exhibit 7, Item 24. Much of the mapped valley deposits contained substantial <br />proportions of colluvium and/or sheetwash materials. The source material for the valley fills was <br />primarily erosion and deposition of loess, leading to a loamy soil texture which supports more lush <br />vegetation than adjacent uplands, even absent sub -irrigation. <br />In addition, valley bottoms within the permit expansion area were very narrow and historically <br />uncultivated. Most floodplains in the area are generally extremely narrow (less than 20 feet), have been <br />severely down -cut, and/or contain too much topographic relief in the form of slopes to be considered <br />capable of being irrigated. Due to downcutting, flooding does not extend beyond the limits of the incised <br />channel. <br />Collom — Rule 2, Page 128 Revision Date: 1/6/17 <br />Revision No.: TR -109 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.