Laserfiche WebLink
EXHIBIT 24,ITEM 1 <br /> COLLOM HAUL ROAD CULVERTS <br /> Introduction <br /> The location of the Collom Haul Road is presented on Map 25E. Sheet 1 of that Map presents <br /> the general location of the road, and the individual culverts presented in this exhibit. <br /> As discussed with DRMS staff during initial permitting for the Collom Mine, it was agreed and <br /> subsequently approved that an alternate flood prediction tool could be used for these two larger <br /> watersheds because of SEDCAD's inability to accurately predict peak flows from such a large <br /> drainage areas. A program known as Trihydro was chosen. This program has developed and <br /> maintained by WWC Engineering of Sheridan, Wyoming. It is based on the NRCS Triangular <br /> Unit Hydrograph method and has been in widespread use in the mining field for over 25 years. <br /> The peak flows and total runoff volumes are based off of a curve number of 63 which can be <br /> found in Volume 2D, Exhibit 7, Table 1. <br /> Wilson Creek Crossings <br /> For the Wilson Creek culvert, the upstream drainage area consists of Wilson Creek for about 10 <br /> miles south to the ridgeline known as the Danforth Hills. Map 12B shows the boundaries of this <br /> drainage basin. At the proposed crossing point, the upstream drainage area is about 9,241 acres <br /> (14.43 square miles). <br /> Rule 4.03.1(4)(e) requires that crossings be designed for a 20 year-24 hour event if the average <br /> end area of the culvert is expected to exceed 35 square feet (an 80-inch diameter culvert). In <br /> spite of this, for a more conservative approach,the culvert at Wilson Creek has been designed for <br /> the 100 year event. Based on the drainage areas, the stream lengths, elevation changes and other <br /> parameters as shown in Figures 1, Trihydro predicts 100 year peak flows for Wilson Creek to be <br /> 404 cfs and the total runoff volume to be 242 acre-feet. <br /> Figure 2 presents a generally accepted FHWA nomograph for flow through culverts operating <br /> under the entrance control condition. The nomograph is marked up to illustrate acceptable pipe <br /> diameters for the Wilson Creek crossing. Acceptable solutions have been limited to diameters <br /> that can deliver the design flow with a Headwater/Diameter (HW/D) ratio of 1.5 or less. Pipe <br /> ends mitered to conform to the slope have been assumed, and the pipe will have riprap placed at <br /> the sides and inlet to a height 4 feet about the top of the crown. <br /> At Wilson Creek, it can be seen on Figure 2 that a 7-foot diameter pipe can pass the 404 cfs <br /> design flow at a HW/D of about 1.3. An alternate design of twin 66 inch diameter pipes would <br /> also be adequate. In the final road design however, it was determined that a 12 foot diameter <br /> pipe will be installed at this crossing which surpass the minimum requirements. This pipe size <br /> was selected as approximately 3 foot of fill will be placed in the pipe bottom for a natural <br /> channel surface to comply with other regulatory requirements. <br /> Exh.24-1-1 Revision Date: 12/30/16 <br /> Revision No.: TR-108 <br />