Laserfiche WebLink
l <br /> ' <br /> ipvi roipn)ept . <br /> LARRY E.O'BRIAN ItfeEIVEE) 7985 VANCE DRIVE,SUITE 205A <br /> FOUNDER ARVADA,COLORADO 90003 <br /> STEVAN L.O'BRIAN �111G 0 9 ��� 303-423-7297 <br /> PRESIDENT FAX 303-423-7599 <br /> August 4 , 2017 DMWN pF RECLAMAT%-,-N <br /> MINING AND SAFET r <br /> Mr. Jared Ebert <br /> Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety <br /> 1313 Sherman St, Suite 215 <br /> Denver, CO 80203 <br /> Dear Jared; <br /> Re : McAtee Construction Company. Inc . - Green Brother Pit #2 <br /> Permit # M-1995-030 - Adequacy Response #1 <br /> On behalf of our client McAtee Construction Company. Inc . , I <br /> will respond to your July 31, 2017 adequacy review letter in the <br /> order and number format presented in that document . I have <br /> added cccCii NG1T`i.. to be ad..ii2S$ed i.i'Jr'i your lEt.,..i :av^ whcn <br /> reviewing our response we do not have to keep referring back to <br /> your adequacy letter. <br /> As part of this response I have revised the appropriate <br /> places in the application text that needed to be corrected and <br /> have enclosed the replacement pages for the application packet . <br /> If the Division wishes, I can supply a new electronic version of <br /> the entire application packet with the changes incorporated in it <br /> so everything is in one file . <br /> Exhibit D-Mine Plan <br /> 1. Page 5 of the revised mine plan indicates "Along the east side we have included a larger <br /> portion of the old mined area to have room to expand the Plant Site if needed and to better define <br /> the west line." The Division believes the applicant meant that they included additional area to <br /> the west. Please confirm. <br /> That is a typographical error and as you suggest it should <br /> have been "west side" . A revised page 5 is attached with <br /> this response . <br /> Exhibit E —Reclamation Plan <br /> 2. Page 7 of the reclamation plan indicates that 46.65 ± acres will be disturbed by the mining <br /> operation. Page 6 of the mining plan indicates that 42.18 acres will be affected by the mining <br /> operation. Please clarify this discrepancy. <br />