My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-02-03_PERMIT FILE - C1980004 (26)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1980004
>
2017-02-03_PERMIT FILE - C1980004 (26)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2017 9:04:09 AM
Creation date
7/13/2017 9:00:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980004
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/3/2017
Section_Exhibit Name
Appendix U Construction Quality Assurance Plan
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
APPENDIX U <br />on the same soils subjected to different specified compaction energies. The line of <br />optimums is essentially parallel to the zero air voids curve (100% saturation), and <br />typically corresponds to a soil saturation of about 85%. An adequate QA/QC <br />requirement to ensure that a compacted low permeability soil liner will achieve a <br />hydraulic conductivity of less than or equal to 1.0 x 10.7 cm/sec should state that at least <br />80% of field measured moisture content/dry density points fall on or above the line of <br />optimums. See Reference number 4 below for supplemental information. <br />Soil Drainage Layer - QA/QC design requirements for soil drainage materials used in <br />the cell leachate collection system (LCS) should ensure suitability of drainage material, <br />proper placement and compaction (as applicable) and subsequent protection. Consistent <br />with WCF recommendations, the CQA testing program should emphasize grain -size <br />distribution analyses rather than hydraulic conductivity testing, with particular attention <br />paid to the amount of fines present in the drainage material. <br />Accordingly, a demonstration should be made in terms of grain size distribution analyses, <br />that the range of the soil drainage material source can achieve the minimum required <br />permeability. The design requirements should be written in terms of the grain -size <br />distribution analyses that correlate with attainment of the minimum required <br />permeability, as based on the results of a successful demonstration. <br />The Soil Drainage Layers CQA grain size and hydraulic conductivity test frequencies in <br />the following QA/QC TESTING TABLE are based on incorporation of a grain -size <br />distribution specification(s) that correlates with attainment of the minimum required <br />permeability. The Division strongly recommends that the hydraulic conductivity testing <br />frequency should be increased to compensate for elimination of the grain -size distribution <br />specification(s). <br />Synthetic LCS Materials - Suitable synthetic drainage materials may be proposed. <br />However, select trash should not be used for LCS drainage material. <br />In order to minimize bio fouling, geotextile is not recommended as a filter wrap around <br />collector piping or around gravel bedding used as a collector. However, it is believed <br />that the greater surface area available from a geotextile blanket that overlies a drainage <br />layer allows leachate flow prior to entering the collector pipe. The fabric may clog <br />directly over the collector but continue to permit flow within a few feet of the collector <br />and between collectors.3 <br />Protective Layer — The integrity of LCS's should not be compromised by the intrusion <br />of fine grained soils, overlying wastes or other contaminants or by penetration of heavy <br />objects. Engineered protective layers (including appropriate soil filters and geotextiles) <br />and supervised placement of innocuous "select trash" over leachate collection systems <br />are examples where QA/QC measures may be employed to reduce potential adverse <br />effects on the LCS's ability to transmit flow. Another advantage of employing <br />engineered soil protective layers is to aid in mitigating potential adverse effects of <br />desiccation and freeze/thaw cycles on an underlying soil liner's hydraulic conductivity. <br />Additionally, engineered soil protective layers and geotextiles may be used to aid in <br />mitigating potential degradation of geomembranes from ultra violet light. <br />PR -02 10/12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.