My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-02-03_PERMIT FILE - C1980004 (22)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1980004
>
2017-02-03_PERMIT FILE - C1980004 (22)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2017 8:44:19 AM
Creation date
7/13/2017 8:40:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980004
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/3/2017
Section_Exhibit Name
Appendix P Water Depletion Estimates
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
APPENDIX P <br />McClane Canyon Mine Expansion and Fruita Loadout Facility Biological Assessment <br />• Minimize subadult and adult entrainment at diversion/out-take structures. <br />• Investigate and provide habitats for all life stages. <br />• Ensure protection from overutilization. <br />• Ensure protection from diseases and parasites. <br />• Regulate non-native fish releases and escapement. <br />• Control problematic cion=native fishes. <br />• Minimize risk of increased hybridization. <br />• Minimize risk of hazardous materials spills in critical habitat. <br />• Remediate water quality problems. <br />• Provide for long-term management and protection.. <br />Critical habitat. The FWS designated critical habitat for the bonytail in river channels and <br />flooded, ponded, or 'inundated riverine habitats that would be suitable for adults and young <br />(FWS, 1994). Critical habitat within Colorado has been designated on the Colorado River in <br />Mesa County from Ruby Canyon (Black Rocks River Mile 137), downstream to Fish Ford River <br />on the Utah -Colorado border (FWS, 1994). The PCEs are the same as critical habitat for <br />Colorado pikeminnow described, above. <br />4.3.3.2 Environmental Baseline <br />Current Status in the Action Area. Apparently, there -are no self-sustaining populations of <br />bonytails in the'Colorado River Basin. During the 1960s through the early 1980s, adult bonytail <br />were captured in the Upper Colorado River Basin including the Yampa River, Green River, and <br />Colorado River mainstem (FWS, 2002c). Irl 1984, a single bonytail was collected on the <br />Colorado River, at Black Rocks (Kaeding et, all, 1986). Most recently, wild bonytails were <br />captured in Lake Mohave, Nevada (in 2002)'and Lake Havasu, Arizona (in 1990). <br />Recent information suggests that floodplain habitats may be more important to survival and <br />recovery of the bonytai! than originally thought because the last reported concentrations .of the <br />species in the upper Colorado RivetBasin occurred in,or upstream of alluvial fiver reaches with <br />substantial floodplain habitat (FWS, 2002c). However, there are no records of their, occurrence <br />within the Action Area. <br />Critical Habitat. There is no critical habitat for bonytails in the Action Area in Reed Wash. <br />Critical habitat has -been designated on the Colorado River from Ruby Canyon (Black Rocks <br />River Mile 137), downstream to Fish Ford River on the Utah -Colorado border (FWS, 1994). The <br />confluence of Salt Creek with the Colorado River is approximately 8 miles upstream from Black <br />Rocks in Ruby Canyon: <br />4.3.3.3 Effects by the Proposed Action <br />Direct and -indirect Effects. Water depletions would adversely affect critica_I habitat for the <br />bonytail. Waterborne selenium appears to affect young bonytails as it affects Colorado <br />pikeminnows and razorback suckers (Hamilton, 1995). Toxicity effects may contribute to <br />absence of bonytail reproduction in the upper Colorado River blit definitive evidence has .not <br />been found. Nevertheless, all of the pathways that the Proposed Action could contribute <br />selenium to enter waterbodies, discussed above for Colorado pikeminnow, would affect bonytail <br />recovery in the upper Colorado River system. <br />Cumulative Effects. As discussed above for Colorado pikeminnow, no State, tribal,.local, or <br />private actions are reasonably certain'to occur within Reed Wash and the 100-year.floodplain. <br />Other potential cumulative effects. associated with human population .growth in Garfield and <br />Mesa counties are expected to generate cumulative effects -to bonytails as described above for <br />Colorado pikeminnows. <br />33 <br />PR -02 10/12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.