My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-02-03_PERMIT FILE - C1980004 (22)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1980004
>
2017-02-03_PERMIT FILE - C1980004 (22)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2017 8:44:19 AM
Creation date
7/13/2017 8:40:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980004
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/3/2017
Section_Exhibit Name
Appendix P Water Depletion Estimates
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
APPENDIX P <br />McClane Canyon Mine Expansion and Fruita Loadout Facility Biological Assessment <br />4.2 Determinations of "No Effect" <br />The. Proposed Action would have "no effect" on seven of the listed species included in this <br />section. A determination of no effect is the appropriate conclusion when the action agency <br />determines that .the Proposed Action would not affect listed species or critical habitat (FWS and <br />NMFS, 1998). A brief justification for determinations of. no effect is provided below. <br />Canada Lynx. Canada lynx within the contiguous United States were listed as threatened on <br />March 24, 2000 (FWS, 2000). The listing includes lynx ,within Colorado, which were introduced <br />between. 1999 and, •2007. During that time, the Colorado Division of Wildlife (CDOW) <br />reintroduced 218 Canada lynx to the San Juan Mountains -in southwestern Colorado -(Shenk, <br />2005). Those animals are not designated as experimental under section 100) of ft ESA. FWS <br />recognized the reintroduction as important though not essential for recovery of lynx; ' the <br />reintroduction program has been included in the recovery plan, but not critical habitat <br />designation '(FWS, 2006). Critical habitat, was 'initially designated for Canada lynx in 2006 <br />(FWS, 2006) and areas of designated crifical habitat were revised in 2009 (FWS, 2009a); <br />however, no critical habitat has been designated in Colorado. , <br />Canada lynx are likely to occur within the GJFO Resource Management Plan Planning Area <br />(RMPPA) as they expand their range within Colorado, and they have been documented on <br />National Forest System lands adjacent 4o the RMPPA (BLM, 2009). Available information <br />indicates a few lynx have.been documented near the Garfield -Mesa County border inthe vicinity <br />of'Baxter Pass, west -of the project area near. the border with Utah, 'and north of the -'project area <br />near the Garfield -Rib BlancoCounty border east of State Highway 139 (Shenk, 2005). Also, <br />lynx have apparently crossed State_ Highway 139 north of the Mine Site (Crooks et al., 2008). <br />There is no suitable denning or foraging habitat present at or in the vicinity of the Mine Site or <br />Loadout Facility and there are no large blocks of habitat in western Colorado north of Interstate <br />70 and east of SHA3 (Rifle to Meeker) that would be suitable for lynx (Broderdorp, 2011). The <br />few lynx from. the reintroduction program that were observed in western Mesa and Garfield <br />counties were likely exploring new terrain following their release and are not expected to utilize <br />the area or cross State Highway 139 again (Broderdorp, 2011). Lynx are not expected to occur <br />on or in the vicinity of the Mine Site or in the vicinity of the Loadout Facility and the Project <br />would have no effect on Canada lynx. - <br />Mexiican Spotted- Owl. The Mexican spatted owl was listed as a threatened species in 1993 <br />(FWS, 1993).. At the time they were listed, there were only 20 historic records (13 records <br />accepted) of spotted owls in Colorado, mostly from the San Juan Mountains in,=southwestem <br />Colorado. The FWS (2004) -designated over 8.6 million acres of critical habitat for the Mexican <br />spotted owl over four western states, including Utah and Colorado: The closest designated <br />critical habitat Unit (CP -15) is on BLM-administered land within Carbon and Emery counties, <br />Utah (FWS, 2004). <br />Potential habitat for the Mexican spotted owl, is found in the RMPPA,'- but spotted owls have <br />never been documented in the project area (BLM, _ 2009). Also, conditions within western <br />Garfield County are generally -too dry, woodlands Provide too little cover and shade, and canyon. <br />topography is unsuitable as habitat for Mexican spotted owls. They are not. expected to occur in <br />the vicinity of the Mine Site or Loadout Facility and the Project would have no effect on Mexican <br />spotted owls. <br />Greenback Cutthroat Trout. The greenback cutthroat trout was included on the 1967 list of <br />nativefish and wildlife threatened with extinction under the Endangered Species Preservation <br />Act of 1966 (FWS, 1967) and included in Appendix D, the "United States List of Endangered <br />Native Fish and Wildlife" (FWS, 1970) prior to enactment- of the ESA of 1973. In 1973, <br />16 <br />PR -02 10/12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.