My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-02-03_PERMIT FILE - C1980004 (15)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1980004
>
2017-02-03_PERMIT FILE - C1980004 (15)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2017 8:12:40 AM
Creation date
7/13/2017 8:08:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980004
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/3/2017
Section_Exhibit Name
Appendix J Cultural Resource Inventory
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />d <br />Ed <br />n <br />archaic in origin; however, testing is necessary in each case <br />1 <br />before any dates can be ascribed to them. <br />The Hayden Survey of the early 1870's records the existance <br />of historic Ute trails throughout the area including each of the <br />tributaries as well as the main canyon. Certainly there was <br />prehistoric use the entire region; however, the surface exposures <br />of such is minimal. The anglo-saxon impact on the entire region <br />occurred after the removal of the Utes in 1882. <br />Throughout the region the direction of exploitation took <br />on the character of mining, farming and ranching. Coal mining <br />activities occur along the Bookcliffs in the coal bearing layers <br />of the Mt. Garfield formation. Evidence of ranching on the south <br />side of Douglas Pass have centers (1) at the head of the canyon, <br />(2) up Barrel Springs Creek (Historic sites H5115 and H558), (3) <br />in Hay and Calf Canyons, (4) at the junction of Hay Canyon and <br />East Salt Creek, and at the mouth of the Main Canyon. Petroglyphs <br />along Hwy. 139 attest to the use and occupation of the area by <br />sheepherders as well as cattlemen. <br />Findings and Conclusions: <br />No cultural indicators were observed during the surface <br />inspection for this survey. Also, there are few areas which can <br />be considered "suspect" and might contain subsurface deposits. <br />In this case, the assignment of "suspect" to certain prospective <br />sites is an assessment with a probability of less than 50% chance <br />of subsurface deposits being found. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.