Laserfiche WebLink
5 <br /> <br />5 <br />Trapper Mine PR8 Preliminary Adequacy Review <br />Prepared by: R. Reilley July 2017 <br />some ground water is exposed. Larger flows in Deacon Gulch are limited to springtime melts and <br />precipitation events in the lower reaches outside of the permit boundary. <br /> <br />Jeffway Gulch is dry for the majority of the length within the PR-7 permit boundary (as also shown in the <br />added Table 2.7-12c, page 2-414m and added Figure 2.7-15f, page 2-414n). As described in replacement <br />page 2-1411, at the southern edge of the expansion area a large unnamed tributary to Jeffway Gulch joins the <br />main channel. A series of seeps are present within the PR-7 expansion area, as is intermittent flows from a <br />large seep complex within the tributary from the east. The area becomes very wet at this junction and a <br />defined channel leaves the expansion area at County Road 33. This riparian area is not expected to be <br />disturbed as it is beyond the extent of the coal reserves in this area. The seeps appear to originate from the <br />base of the Twenty Mile Sandstone and shale layers below the sandstone. <br /> <br />TMI has sampled Jeffway Gulch at the location of the seeps at the southern edge of the permit area at a site <br />labeled as Jeffway Spring@ County Road 33. Replacement page 2-451s has been updated to reflect the <br />addition of water quality sampling. Figure 2.7-15f, page 2-414n, shows the visual flow observations for <br />Deacon Gulch and Jeffway Gulch and the water quality sampling for Jeffway Gulch. Water quality results <br />are shown on Table 2.7-18b, pages 2-451 v through 2-451 x. <br /> <br />The water quality shows the dominant cations as magnesium and calcium, and the dominant anions as <br />sulfate and bicarbonate. The samples can generally be characterized as magnesium- calcium-sulfate- <br />bicarbonate type waters. Little variance is seen in the water quality over the time period of sampling. The <br />pH is slightly alkaline at 8.0 to 8.2. All water quality values are below the primary drinking water standards <br />and the surface water quality standards for the lower Yampa River (Colorado Water Quality Control <br />Commission Regulation #37, Stream Classifications and Water Quality Standards for the Lower <br />Yampa/Green River. <br /> <br />July 2017 DRMS <br />This section of the stipulation is adequately addressed. DRMS notes that the riparian area is not <br />expected to be disturbed and that the Jeffway Spring system at County Road 33 will continue to be <br />monitored. <br /> <br />May 2017 Trapper <br />e) Soil resource information required by Rule 2.04.9 for those portions of the permit area to be disturbed <br />by surface operations and facilities. <br /> <br />An Order I soil survey was performed on the expanded 795.71 acres in the PR-7 permit expansion area in <br />2014 to satisfy the permit baseline soils sampling requirements of the DRMS regulations. The 2014 survey <br />identified soil mapping units based on the 2004 Soil Survey of Moffat County Area, Colorado published by <br />the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). <br /> <br />Previous surveys of the Trapper permit area were performed in 1972, 1979, and 1980. In 1986 the soil <br />surveys were updated to conform to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Moffat County soil survey <br />in effect at that time. The earlier soil surveys used older mapping soil series numbers and nomenclature as <br />recognized in the 1986 letter from Darrell Schroeder in Section 2.6.1.1 of the Trapper Mine permit <br />document. Many of these older soil series could not be matched to the newer USDA soil series groups and <br />mapping units or to the later 2004 NRCS Soil Survey of Moffat County. The original soil series descriptions <br />from the 1972 and 1980 surveys are included in Section 2.6.1.1 to retain all relevant data from the original <br />permit. The PR-7 area soils descriptions, based on the 2004 NRCS Soil Survey of Moffat County, have been <br />placed in a new Section 2.6.3 of the permit document. All soils mapped and nomenclature in the 2014 <br />survey and future surveys will align with updated soil series descriptions provided by NRCS and the Soil