My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-07-07_REVISION - M1977493
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977493
>
2017-07-07_REVISION - M1977493
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2020 2:22:55 PM
Creation date
7/7/2017 4:01:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977493
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
7/7/2017
Doc Name
Adequacy Review
From
Climax Molybdenum
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR25
Email Name
ECS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Raymond Lazuk June 28, 2017 <br /> Climax Molybdenum Company, Climax Mine 6 1661214 006 RSP RevO <br /> a tailing dam, the 1-in-2475-year event was selected for the post-closure condition to <br /> evaluate the post-closure life. Even using the conservative 1-in-2475-year event, the <br /> pseudo static analysis yielded FoS >_1.0 for the Climax OSF. <br /> The Nevada Division of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Mining Regulation and Reclamation (BMRR) <br /> also publishes stability requirements for heap leach pads, which are similar to the Climax OSF. <br /> Requirements stated are: <br /> ■ Static factor of safety= 1.3 <br /> ■ Pseudo-static factor of safety = 1.05, or deformation analysis demonstrating acceptable <br /> potential movements during the design seismic event. <br /> • The recommended design event is the"seismic event with a maximum 10%probability <br /> of exceedance in 50 years,"which corresponds to the 1-in-475-year event. <br /> • The recommended event is the same as the OBE event used to evaluate the Climax <br /> OSFs during operations. The MDE event used to evaluate the OSFs post-closure <br /> exceeds the recommended event significantly. <br /> A summary of the project design criteria relative to the DRMS and other criteria is provided below in Table 1. <br /> Golder notes that the project criteria for static FoS are more conservative than DRMS, ADEQ, and BMRR <br /> requirements for standard of care. Golder considers the project seismic FoS requirements to represent a <br /> similar level of conservatism and adherence to standards of care. <br /> G,,older <br /> 1661214 006 RSP RevO Responses to DRMS Comments 28JUN17 docx oda}Q s <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.