My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-06-02_REVISION - C1981038 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981038
>
2017-06-02_REVISION - C1981038 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/6/2017 9:30:44 AM
Creation date
7/6/2017 9:29:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981038
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/2/2017
Doc Name
Follow up Questions
From
Judy Martin
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
PR5
Email Name
CCW
JRS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5/15/17 <br />6. 1 am trying to track what the dates and initials on various pages signify— <br />a. Were the requirements more detailed when Bowie asked for renewals or expansion of <br />the permits? <br />b. Were these sign offs by DRMS on new or more detailed requirements as Bowie applied <br />for renewals of the permits? (2001, 2004, 2010 are some of the years at the bottom of <br />various pages) —some say "approved" with a date? <br />Based on operational conditions and other factors, a mine operator can apply for a revision <br />to their permit. These revisions are reviewed by the Division to ensure they meet the <br />requirements of the Rules. In addition to these revisions, the operator must renew their <br />permit every five years. The notation/date you see on the bottom of some pages is the <br />revision number that changed some portion of that page and the date it was approved. This <br />is done to aid in tracking changes in the permit document. <br />7. When did the bond and reclamation requirements shift to Bowie Resources? (Did Bowie buy <br />Westmoreland assuming it's liabilities for maintaining the bond?) <br />I will need to look up the exact dates for the permit transfer. However, when a new operator <br />takes over a site they must follow all of the requirements of the permit. <br />8. The areas around the East Mine and West Mine are very detailed as to what needs to be done <br />to meet reclamation requirements. Without maps though, it isn't clear what relates in <br />particular to the Steven's Gulch parcel to be sold after change of use. What, if any, of the East <br />Mine area is still left to be reclaimed? <br />I will need to have the specialist in charge of this site look up this information. He will be back <br />from the field on Monday. <br />9. Once the Steven's Gulch parcels and the Load Out are sold, are there any other relevant land <br />holdings left to be reclaimed under the bond requirement. <br />I will need to have the specialist in charge of this site look up this information. He will be back <br />from the field on Monday. <br />10. The water tank referred to as being in place in 2004 is required for Pitkin Mesa Pipeline—the <br />reclamation can't be complete unless "alternative arrangements are made for Pitkin Mesa <br />Pipeline and power supply". Does any of this affect Steven's Gulch property? <br />I will need to have the specialist in charge of this site look up this information. He will be back <br />from the field on Monday. <br />11. Does the BLM controlled Road (previously maintained by Bowie until 11/6/06) affect the <br />Steven's Gulch parcels? <br />I will need to have the specialist in charge of this site look up this information. He will be back <br />from the field on Monday. <br />12. Is there any R -O -M coal still near or close to the Steven's Gulch property to be sold? <br />Questions on Bowie 1 reclamation requirements <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.